Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

And then came Complex Project Management

By S. J. Whitty and Harvey Maylor

Abstract

The subject of management is renowned for its addiction to fads and fashions. Project Management is no exception. The issue of interest for this paper is the establishment of standards in the area, specifically the ‘College of Complex Project Managers’ and their ‘competency standard for complex project managers’. Both the college and the standard have generated significant interest in the Project Management community. Whilst the need for development of the means to manage complex projects is acknowledged, a critical evaluation show significant flaws in the definition of complex in this case, the process by which the College and its standard have emerged, and the content of the standard. If Project Management is to continue to develop as a profession, it will need an evidence-based approach to the generation of knowledge and standards. The issues raised by the evaluation provide the case for a portfolio of research that extends the existing bodies of knowledge into large-scale complicated (or major) projects. We propose that it would be owned by the practitioner community, rather than focused on one organization. Research questions are proposed that would commence this stream of activity towards an intelligent synthesis of what is required to manage in both complicated and truly complex environments. This is a revised paper previously presented at the 21st IPMA World Congress on Project Management Cracow

Topics: Complex project management, Competency standards, Major projects
Publisher: Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.03.004
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/4142
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. A Memetic Paradigm of Project Management. doi
  2. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. doi
  3. (2004). Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products. doi
  4. (1980). Association. The Major Projects Association. doi
  5. (2003). Available from: http://www.kpmg.com.au/Portals/0/irmprm pm-survey2003.pdf.
  6. (2006). Competency Standard for Complex Project Managers,
  7. (2001). Complex systems. Nature,
  8. Complexity in Project-based operations: a grounded model and its implications for theory and practice. doi
  9. (2000). Critical chain: the theory of constraints applied to project management. doi
  10. Directions for future research in project management: The mainfindings ofaUKgovernment-funded researchnetwork.
  11. (2003). Dynamics of Complex Systems: Studies in Nonlinearity. doi
  12. (2006). Exploring the role of formal bodies of knowledge in defining a profession: the case of project management doi
  13. (2001). Failsafe IS Project Delivery.
  14. Grasping the Complexity of IS Development Projects. doi
  15. (1997). How nature works : the science of self-organized criticality. doi
  16. Interacting dynamic complexity doi
  17. Interacting structural complexity doi
  18. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, doi
  19. (2006). Ministry of Defence: Major Projects Report
  20. (2001). One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, doi
  21. (2006). Practitioner development: From trained technicians to reflective practitioners doi
  22. (2005). Project Management Survey. doi
  23. (2006). Rethinking Project Management: Researching the actuality of projects. doi
  24. (2007). Risk allocation in the private provision of public infrastructure. doi
  25. (2003). Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order. doi
  26. (1988). The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management.
  27. (1994). The Last Planner.
  28. (1999). The need for new paradigms for complex projects. doi
  29. (2000). The role of feedback dynamics in disruption and delay on the nature of disruption and delay (D&D) in major projects. doi
  30. (1995). The Science of Complexity: An Alternative Perspective for Strategic Change Processes. Strategic Management Journal, doi
  31. (2001). The Standish Group. Extreme Chaos.
  32. (2007). We're not in Kansas Anymore, Toto: Mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory and its relationship to project management. Project Management Journal, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.