Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Computational modelling of the HyperVapotron cooling technique for nuclear fusion applications

By Joseph Milnes

Abstract

Efficient heat transfer technologies are essential for magnetically confined fusion reactors; this applies to both the current generation of experimental reactors as well as future power plants. A number of High Heat Flux devices have therefore been developed specifically for this application. One of the most promising candidates is the HyperVapotron, a water cooled device which relies on internal fins and boiling heat transfer to maximise the heat transfer capability. Over the past 30 years, numerous variations of the HyperVapotron have been built and tested at fusion research centres around the globe resulting in devices that can now sustain heat fluxes in the region of 20 – 30MW/m2 in steady state. Unfortunately, there have been few attempts to model or understand the internal heat transfer mechanisms responsible for this exceptional performance with the result that design improvements are traditionally sought experimentally which is both inefficient and costly. This thesis seeks to develop an engineering model of the HyperVapotron device using commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics software. To establish the most appropriate modelling choices, in-depth studies were performed examining the turbulence models (within the Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes framework), near wall methods, grid resolution and boiling submodels. Validation of the models is accomplished via comparison with experimental results as well as high order Implicit Large Eddy Simulation methods. It is shown that single phase cavity flows and their related heat transfer characteristics (time-averaged) can be accurately captured if the SST k-omega turbulence model is employed using a fine nearwall grid throughout the cavity (e.g. y+ < 1 throughout). Separately, multiphase solutions with tuned wall boiling models also showed reasonable agreement with experimental data for vertical boiling tubes. As more complex multiphase HyperVapotron models were constructed, it became clear that there is an intrinsic incompatibility between the fine grids required for the single phase heat transfer predictions and the coarser grids plus wall functions required by the boiling model. Ultimately, the full 3D solution was based on the coarser grids as the fall off in accuracy in single phase heat transfer only becomes significant for HyperVapotron designs with deeper cavities. Since it is also shown here that deeper cavities are generally less efficient, these grid induced errors become less relevant if the primary objective is to find optimised performance.Comparing the CFD solutions with HyperVapotron experimental data suggests that a RANS-based, multiphase model is indeed capable of predicting performance over a wide range of geometries and boundary conditions. Whilst a definitive set of design improvements is not defined here, it is expected that the methodologies and tools developed will enable designers of future High Heat Flux devices to perform significant virtual prototyping before embarking on the more costly build and test programmes

Publisher: Cranfield University
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/5555
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2007). 3D numerical simulations of hypervapotron cooling concept. doi
  2. A breakthrough in anode cooling systems: The Hyper-Vapotron. Internal report. Date unknown.
  3. (1994). A Characteristic-Based Method for Incompressible Flows. doi
  4. (1989). A comparison between HyperVapotron and Multitube high heat flux beam stopping elements. In: doi
  5. (2005). A mature industrial solution for ITER divertor plasma facing components: HyperVapotron cooling concept adapted to Tore Supra flat tile technology. doi
  6. (1992). A Model for Analytical Performance Prediction of HyperVapotron. In: doi
  7. (1960). A photographic study of pool boiling in the region of the critical heat flux, doi
  8. A two-equation turbulence model of turbulent bubbly flows. doi
  9. (2005). A unified model considering force balances for departing vapour bubbles and population balance in subcooled boiling flow. doi
  10. A wall heat transfer model for subcooled boiling flow. doi
  11. (2008). Advanced CFD Strategies for HyperVapotron flows and heat transfer. In:
  12. (2007). An experimental investigation of critical heat flux performance of hypervapotron in subcooled boiling,
  13. (1995). An introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics. The Finite Volume Method.
  14. Axial void fraction profile in low pressure subcooled flow boiling. doi
  15. (2008). Bubble departure frequency in forced convective subcooled boiling flow. doi
  16. (1989). Cavity Heat Transfer on a Transverse Grooved Wall in a Narrow Flow Channel. doi
  17. (1996). CFD application to prediction of void distribution in two-phase bubbly - 153 -flows in rod bundles. doi
  18. (2003). CFD modelling of subcooled boiling. In: doi
  19. (1995). CFD prediction of flow and phase distribution in fuel assemblies with spacers; NURETH-7, doi
  20. (2005). CFD-modelling of subcooled boiling and application to simulate a hot channel of a fuel assembly. In: doi
  21. (1995). Comparison of Swirl Tube and HyperVapotron for Cooling of ITER Divertor. In: doi
  22. (1996). Comparison of various thermal hydraulic tube concepts for the ITER divertor. In: doi
  23. (2005). Computational Fluid Dynamics modelling of two-phase flow in a boiling water reactor fuel assembly. In: doi
  24. (2010). Computational modelling of cavity arrays with heat transfer using Implicit Large Eddy Simulations. PhD Thesis,
  25. (1969). Correlation of Bubble Departure Diameter for Boiling of Saturated Liquid,
  26. (2001). Critical heat flux test on saw-toothed fin duct under one-sided heating conditions. doi
  27. (1999). Design Issues and Fatigue Lifetime of HyperVapotron Elements of the JET Neutral Beam Injectors, In: doi
  28. Design of experiments using the Taguchi approach.
  29. (1998). Dimensional analysis of critical heat flux in subcooled water flow under one-side heating conditions for fusion application. doi
  30. (1993). Effect of surface wettability on active nucleation site density during pool boiling of water of a vertical surface, doi
  31. Eulerian Two-Phase Flow theory applied to Fluidization, doi
  32. (2006). Experimental examination of heat removal limitation of screw cooling tube at high pressure and temperature conditions. doi
  33. (2003). Experimental optimisation of a HyperVapotron concept for ITER plasma facing components. doi
  34. (1967). Experimental study of true void fraction when boiling subcooled water in vertical tubes,
  35. First step in simulations of HyperVapotron cooling concept for fusion applications. In: doi
  36. (1979). Forced Convection Heat Transfer on Heated Bottom Surface of a Cavity, doi
  37. Handbook of Heat Transfer Fundamentals. doi
  38. (2008). Heat transfer characteristics in subcooled flow boiling with - 151 doi
  39. (2003). Heat transfer predictions based on two equation turbulence models. In:
  40. (2005). High-Resolution Methods for Incompressible and Low-Speed Flows. doi
  41. (2003). HyperVapotron design for the long pulse upgrades on MAST NBI. In: doi
  42. (1993). HyperVapotron Technique in Subcooled Flow Boiling CHF. doi
  43. (2004). Identification of nucleation site interactions. doi
  44. (1977). Influence of flow velocity on surface boiling heat transfer coefficient, Heat Transfer and Boiling doi
  45. (1983). Interfacial area and nucleation site density in boiling systems, doi
  46. (2010). Large–Eddy Simulation of Three–Dimensional Cavity Flow Using a Time–Conservative Finite–Volume Method, doi
  47. (2002). Local flow characteristics of subcooled boiling flow of water in a vertical annulus. doi
  48. Maximum Bubble Diameter, Maximum Bubble-Growth Time and Bubble-Growth Rate during the subcooled nucleate flow boiling of water up to 17.7MN/m doi
  49. Mechanistic Modeling of CHF in forced-convection subcooled boiling.
  50. (2004). Modelling of local two-phase flow parameters in upward subcooled flow boiling at low pressure. doi
  51. (1993). Modelling of vapour generation at wall in sub-cooled boiling two-phase flow.
  52. Multiphase Flow Dynamics 2 Thermal and Mechanical Interactions. 2 nd Edition. doi
  53. (1987). Neutral Beam Injection System. Fusion Technology, Vol 11, doi
  54. (2006). Non-Conservative and Conservative Formulations of CharacteristicsBased Numerical Reconstructions for Incompressible Flows. doi
  55. (1998). Nonlinear Multigrid Method for the Three-Dimensional Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations. doi
  56. (1963). Nucleate boiling. The region of isolated bubbles and the similarity with natural convection, doi
  57. (1993). Numerical simulation of subcooled boiling and heat transfer in vertical ducts. doi
  58. (2002). On numerical modelling of low-pressure subcooled boiling flows. doi
  59. (2005). On Population Balance Approach for Subcooled Boiling Flow Prediction. doi
  60. (1991). On the modeling of multidimensional effects in boiling channels, In:
  61. (2002). Onset of nucleate boiling and active nucleation site density during subcooled flow boiling, doi
  62. (1996). Performance of HyperVapotron Beam-Stopping Elements at JET.
  63. (2003). predicting and enhancing Critical Heat Flux. In:
  64. (2009). Qualitative assessment for RANS models for HyperVapotron flow and heat transfer, doi
  65. Review Article. Two-Phase Flow: Models and Methods. doi
  66. (1989). Reynolds number and end-wall effects on a lid-driven cavity flow, doi
  67. (1920). Subcooled flow boiling at high heat flux. doi
  68. (1980). Technical Report to JET Contract JC110 VHXX. Application of HyperVapotron Techniques to source of the JET cooling problems.
  69. Test of a Narrow Channel Vapotron (4mm Fins,
  70. (1983). Test of Two Hypervaptron Beam Stopping Panels at LBL Berkley. JET Internal Communication.
  71. (1987). Testing of Beam Stopping Elements Using HyperVapotron Cooling. In:
  72. (1955). The Dynamics of Vapor Bubbles in Nonuniform Temperature Fields, doi
  73. (1994). The Influence of Mutual Bubble Interaction on the Bubble Departure Diameter, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, doi
  74. (1934). The Maximum and Minimum Values of Heat Q Transmitted from Metal to Boiling Water under Atmospheric Pressure, doi
  75. The simulation of multidimensional multiphase flows. doi
  76. (2001). Thermal Hydraulics of water cooled divertors. Fusion Engineering and Design doi
  77. (1970). Transfert de flux superieur a 1kW/cm2 par double changement de phase entre une paroi non isotherme et un liquide en convection forcee,
  78. (1964). Tunnel Experiments on the Flow Over Rectangular Cavities at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds. Reports and Memoranda, 3438, Aeronautical Research Council,
  79. Turbulence in multiphase flow. doi
  80. UKAEA Internal Report. Correlation of ANSYS HyperVapotron modelling with - 150 -experimental results, and proposal for a new HyperVapotron design.
  81. (2008). Validation of CFD models for mono- and polydisperse air-water two-phase flows in pipes, doi
  82. Vapour bubbles growth rate and heat transfer intensity at subcooled water boiling, In:
  83. Wall Functions for General Application CFD Codes. AEA Technology, Internal Paper.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.