Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

An examination of the literature relating to issues affecting how companies manage through measures

By Monica Franco-Santos and Mike Bourne

Abstract

In the last decade, organizations have devoted enormous time and effort to the development of business performance measurement (BPM) systems. Many articles have been written on how to design and implement these types of systems. However, few studies have addressed the issue of why some organizations are better able to 'manage through measures' than others. In other words, why do some organizations struggle to ensure that action follows measurement, whilst others systematically use their metrics to inform their decision-making processes, and their subsequent actions? This paper aims to contribute to a more complete understanding of the use of BPM systems by reviewing the performance measurement literature developed in the management arena. It differs from previous examinations of performance measurement and management control systems in that it uses a broader scope and follows a new method of literature review applied to management research, namely, systematic review. The paper focuses on the thematic analysis of the review only. The insights extracted from the literature are articulated and presented in a management framework. In addition, the paper identifies different gaps in the literature that require further research

Topics: Performance measurement systems, Performance measurement, Performance measures
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09537280512331333020
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/3035
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems, doi
  2. (1999). A practical guide to using the balanced scorecard,
  3. (1985). Accounting systems and systems of accountability -understanding accounting practices in their organizational contexts, doi
  4. (1999). Aligning strategic performance measures and results,
  5. (1984). An assessment of critical success factors, doi
  6. (2000). An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes non-financial performance measures, doi
  7. (1995). An empirical study of division and plant performance measurement systems in selected world-class manufacturing firms - linkages for competitive23 advantage, doi
  8. (1997). An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness, doi
  9. (2001). Applying the balanced scorecard concept: an experience report, doi
  10. (1998). Are non-financial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction, doi
  11. (2000). Assessing some distinctive dimensions of performance feedback information in high performing plants, doi
  12. (2002). Balanced scorecard: two perspectives,
  13. (2003). Balanced scorecards: A rising trend in strategic performance measurement,
  14. (1996). Changing performance measures at Caterpillar, Management Accounting,
  15. (2002). Communicating and controlling strategy: an empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard, doi
  16. (1992). Creating a comprehensive system to measure performance,
  17. (1996). Delivering the goods at TNT: The role of the performance measurement system, doi
  18. (2000). Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems, doi
  19. (1998). Diagnosing the integrity of your performance measurement system,
  20. (1972). Early cost accounting for internal management control: lyman mills in the 1850s, Business History Review, doi
  21. (2001). Effectiveness of planning and control systems: an empirical study of US and Japanese firms, doi
  22. (1996). From balanced scorecard to strategic gauges: Is measurement worth it?,
  23. (2002). Good enough' performance measurement: a trade-off between activity and action, doi
  24. (2000). Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it,
  25. (1998). How non-financial performance measures are used,
  26. (2003). Implementing performance measurement systems: a literature review, doi
  27. (2001). Information flows for high-performance manufacturing,
  28. (1997). Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide, doi
  29. (2001). Limitations of and barriers to using performance measurement: purchaser's perspective,
  30. (2001). Linking actions to profits in strategic decision making,
  31. (2000). Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance, doi
  32. (1996). Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy, doi
  33. (2002). Management accounting and performance measures in Japanese banks, doi
  34. (1978). Management accounting in an early multidivisional organisation: general motors in the 1920s, Business History Review, doi
  35. (1975). Management accounting in early integrated industry: e.i. Dupont de nemours powder company, 1903-1912, Business History Review, doi
  36. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: a critical review,
  37. (2002). Management control: Toward a new paradigm? In
  38. (1980). Managing our way to economic decline,
  39. (1991). Measure up - The essential guide to measuring business performance,
  40. (1990). Methode de conception et d'implantation de systmes de measure de performances pour organisations industrielles, Universita de Bordeaux I.
  41. (1999). Overcoming obstacles to developing effective performance measures , doi
  42. (2003). Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial service firms, doi
  43. (2002). Performance management and operational research: a marriage made in heaven?, doi
  44. (1999). Performance management: a framework for management control systems research, doi
  45. (1999). Performance measurement and managerial teams, doi
  46. (2000). Performance measurement and the use of league tables: Some experimental evidence of dysfunctional consequences, doi
  47. (1991). Performance measurement in service business, doi
  48. (2001). Performance measurement practices survey results,
  49. (1995). Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda, doi
  50. (1996). Performance measurement system design: Should process based approaches be adopted?, doi
  51. (2003). Performance measures and the rationalization of organizations, doi
  52. (2000). Performance standards in incentive contracts, doi
  53. (1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work, doi
  54. (1997). Quality strategy, strategic control systems, and organizational performance, doi
  55. (1994). Realising strategy through measurement, doi
  56. (1987). Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting, doi
  57. (2000). Saving money, saving lives, doi
  58. (1993). Strategies and styles revisited - strategic control - is it tenable, doi
  59. (1998). Strategy implementation: the new realities, doi
  60. (2004). Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes, doi
  61. (2003). Subjectivity and the weighting of22 performance measures: evidence form a balanced scorecard, doi
  62. (1998). Synthesizing research, (Thousand Oaks, CA:
  63. (1994). Systematic reviews Rationale for Systematic Reviews, doi
  64. (1997). Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions, doi
  65. (2001). Target setting for evolutionary and revolutionary process change, doi
  66. (1989). The achievability of profit center budget targets: a field study, Accounting Review, doi
  67. (2000). The appropriate use of performance measurement in non-21 production activity - the case of engineering design, doi
  68. (1985). The awakening giant: continuity and change in Imperial Chemical Industries, doi
  69. (2000). The balance on the balanced scorecard - a critical analysis of some of its assumptions, doi
  70. (1992). The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance,
  71. (1996). The balanced scorecard - translating strategy into action, doi
  72. (1999). The balanced scorecard: A necessary good or an unnecessary evil?, doi
  73. (1998). The balanced scorecard: the eleventh commandment,
  74. (2003). The balanced scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the Balanced Scorecard., Accounting, doi
  75. (1996). The changing basis of performance measurement, doi
  76. (1999). The forces that shape organisational performance measurement systems: an interdisciplinary review, doi
  77. (1988). The impact of key success factors on company performance, doi
  78. (1987). The medical review article: State of the science, doi
  79. (1991). The performance measurement manifesto,
  80. (1994). The performance paradox,
  81. (2002). The performance prism: the scorecard for measuring and managing business success, doi
  82. (2001). The strategy-focused organization: how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment, doi
  83. (1998). The ten commandments of balanced scorecard implementation,
  84. (2000). The use of performance information in the management of service delivery, doi
  85. (1998). Three modes of measurement: Theory and practice, doi
  86. (1981). Toward a new understanding of nineteenth-century cost accounting, The Accounting Review,
  87. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review, doi
  88. (2001). Understanding performance measurement Systems Using physical science uncertainty principles, doi
  89. (2003). Why some performance measurement initiatives fail: lessons from the change management literature, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.