Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Scoping the contextual issues that influence shrinkage measurement.

By Paul Chapman and Simon Templar

Abstract

Measures and measurement systems must reflect the context to which they are applied (Neely, 1999), requiring that the contextual issues relating to retail shrinkage must be identified as a necessary precursor when measuring shrinkage. Without considering these issues any decision on which method of shrinkage measurement to employ will be uninformed, arbitrary and at best intuitive

Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1108/09590550610710255
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/1357
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). 11 th Annual Retail Crime Survey 2003, British Retail Consortium,
  2. (2004). Antecedents of Counterproductive Behavior at Work: A General Perspective”, doi
  3. (1998). Clearance Pricing and Inventory Policies for Retail Chains”, doi
  4. (2003). Introduction to Survey Quality, doi
  5. (1980). Management Attitudes and Approaches Needed for the Control of Inventory Shortages”,
  6. (1991). Management Research: An Introduction, doi
  7. (1975). Merchant vs. Shoplifter in the Courts”,
  8. (1982). Shortcomings in the Attribution Process: On the Origins and Maintenance of Erroneous Social Assessments”, in doi
  9. (2004). Shrinkage, shoplifting and the cost of retail crime in Europe: a crosssectional analysis of major retailers in 16 European countries”, doi
  10. (2003). Shrinkage: A Collaborative Approach to Reducing Stock Loss in the Supply Chain, ECR Europe,
  11. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review”, doi
  12. (2001). Using a Behaviour-Based Method to Identify and Reduce Employee Theft”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.