Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The shadow in the balance sheet: The spectre of Enron and how accountants use the past as a psychological defence against the future

By David Cooper, Kim James, Richard Kwiatkowski and Richard J. Taffler

Abstract

Accounting frameworks play a crucial role in enabling us to make sense of business. These frameworks provide a common language for individuals, organizations and broader economic groupings to understand and make decisions about the commercial realm in which they operate. From a psychodynamic perspective, the language of accounting also plays an important role. On the one hand it offers a way to tame the uncertainty and unknowability of the future by representing it in the same comforting terms as it does the past, thus reducing anxiety. Accounting provides a ‘shorthand’, which achieves a balance between positive and negative, debit and credit, asset and liability. On the other hand, accounting can also provide an arena in which fantasies about the future can be staged. However, the use of accounting language is problematic, particularly when it comes to dealing with the future. First, accounting frameworks are inherently backward looking and second, the reassuring sense of clarity and predictability they give are bought at the price of unrealistic simplification. The shadow is never far away and is a constant source of surprises in the unfolding future of a business. Rationalizing and sanitizing the shadow through accounting language may alleviate anxiety but fails to provide an escape from its effects, and echoes from the shadow side of business are capable of shaking the world in the form of accounting scandals. Governments and businesses have reacted to scandals such as Enron and Worldcom by tightening legislation and refining accounting standards but little, if anything, has been done to bring us any closer to confronting the shadow of business where these scandals have their r

Topics: Shadow, Accounting, Intangibles, Systems Psychodynamics, Defence Mechanism
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/3255
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). Accounting Representation and the Onion Model of Reality: A Comparison With Baudrillard's Orders of Simulcra and His Hyperreality', doi
  2. (2003). Alternative Management Accounting Research -Whence and Whither', doi
  3. (1993). Culture, Self-Identity and Work, doi
  4. (2000). Emotions in organisations; disturbance or intelligence?’ International Society for the Psychoanalytic Study of Organisations Annual Symposium London,
  5. (2003). Enron the Rise and Fall, doi
  6. (1987). How Institutions Think, doi
  7. (2003). Intangibles and Intellectual Capital: An Introduction to a Special Issue', doi
  8. (2003). Intellectual Capital Accounting As Management Fashion: A Review and Critique', doi
  9. (2000). Looking Forward to the Past', doi
  10. (2001). Mobilising Change Through the Management Control of Intangibles', doi
  11. (1985). Narcissism and Leadership: An Object Relations Perspective', doi
  12. (1979). Narcissism, Identity and Legitimacy',
  13. (1990). Narcissistic Process and Corporate Decay, doi
  14. (1968). Operations Research and Accounting: Competitors or Partners?',
  15. (2002). Organisational Destructivity and the Perverse State of Mind’
  16. (2003). Power Failure: The Rise and Fall of Enron,
  17. (1999). Psychopathology of Everyday Investing',
  18. (1999). The challenge of integrating psychodynamic and organisation theory’ doi
  19. (1978). The Culture of Narcissism, American Life in and Age of Diminishing Expectations, W.W.Norton, doi
  20. (1973). The Denial of Death, doi
  21. (1987). The Rise of Accounting Controls in British Capitalist Enterprises', doi
  22. (2003). The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron, doi
  23. (1991). Turning Facts into Stories and Stories into Facts: A Hermeneutic Exploration of Organizational Folklore', doi
  24. (2002). What Went Wrong at Enron, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.