Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Stakeholder Relationships and Programme Reporting across Leading FTSE Companies.

By Simon Knox, Stan Maklan and P. French


Although it is now widely recognised by business leaders that their companies need to accept a broader responsibility than short-term profits, recent research suggests that as corporate social responsibility (CSR) and social reporting become more widespread, there is little empirical evidence of the range of stakeholders addressed through their CSR programmes and how such programmes are reported. Through a CSR framework which was developed in an exploratory study, we explore the nature of stakeholder relationships reported across leading FTSE companies and the importance they attach to communicating both social and business outcomes. It is evident from the hypotheses tested that the bigger FTSE companies, particularly extraction companies and telecoms, are more adept at identifying and prioritising their stakeholders, and linking CSR programmes to business and social outcomes. However, we draw the general conclusion that building stronger stakeholder relationships through CSR programmes – other than with customers – is not currently a priority for most companies. We also conclude that a limited sophistication in managing multiple stakeholders may compromise the impact of CSR upon business and social results. Finally, the managerial implications and the contribution of our study are discussed before closing with an acknowledgement of the limitations of this work and suggestions for further rese

Publisher: Springer Science Business Media
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s10551-005-0303-4
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles


  1. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, doi
  2. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Model of Corporate Performance’, doi
  3. (2002). Accountability Primer: Socially responsible investment. ment.pdf.
  4. (1989). Building Theories from Case study Research’, doi
  5. (2002). Business and Society: corporate social responsibility doi
  6. (2001). Business and Society: developing corporate social responsibility in the UK. doi
  7. (1999). Charting New Directions for Marketing’, doi
  8. (1993). Conducting case study research in operations management’, doi
  9. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited’ doi
  10. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework’, doi
  11. (2000). Creating the Partnership Society: Understanding the Rhetoric and Reality of Cross-Sectoral Partnerships’, doi
  12. (2003). CSR at the Crossroads’, Published by Edelman,
  13. (2002). Customers as Innovators’,
  14. (2004). data and detailed LSD analysis by company market capitalisation and industry sector can be obtained from:
  15. (1998). Doing Research in Business and Management: An Introduction to Process and Method. doi
  16. (2003). Empirical Developments in the Measurement of Involvement, Brand Loyalty and their Relationship in Grocery Markets’, doi
  17. (1998). Financial Theory and Corporate Policy. doi
  18. Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics', doi
  19. (1986). Lead Users: A Source of doi
  20. (2001). Measuring and Managing Brand Loyalty’, doi
  21. (1989). New Product Ideas from Lead Users’,
  22. (1999). No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies. doi
  23. Present,L.,1995, ‘the Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications’, doi
  24. (1999). Stakeholder Influence Strategies', doi
  25. (1995). Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance, doi
  26. (2002). The Committed Enterprise, doi
  27. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance Financial Performance Link', doi
  28. (1996). The Loyalty Effect, doi
  29. (2003). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’, doi
  30. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.