Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Modeling environmental benefits of silvoarable agroforestry in Europe.

By João H. N. Palma, Anil R. Graves, R. G. H. Bunce, Paul J. Burgess, R. de Filippi, K. J. Keesman, Herman van Keulen, F. Liagre, Martina Mayus, G. Moreno, Y. Reisner and F. Herzog

Abstract

Increased adoption of silvoarable agroforestry (SAF) systems in Europe, by integrating trees and arable crops on the same land, could offer a range of environmental benefits compared with conventional agricultural systems. Soil erosion, nitrogen leaching, carbon sequestration and landscape biodiversity were chosen as indicators to assess a stratified random sample of 19 landscape test sites in the Mediterranean and Atlantic regions of Europe. At each site, the effect of introducing agroforestry was examined at plot-scale by simulating the growth of one of five tree species (hybrid walnut Juglans spp., wild cherry Prunus avium L., poplar Populus spp., holm oak Quercus ilex L. subsp. ilex and stone pine Pinus pinea L.) at two tree densities (50 and 113 trees ha−1) in combination with up to five crops (wheat Triticum spp., sunflower Helianthus annuus L., oilseed rape Brassica napus L., grain maize and silage maize Zea mays L.). At landscape-scale, the effect of introducing agroforestry on 10 or 50% of the agricultural area, on either the best or worst quality land, was examined. Across the 19 landscape test sites, SAF had a positive impact on the four indicators with the strongest effects when introduced on the best quality land. The computer simulations showed that SAF could significantly reduce erosion by up to 65% when combined with contouring practices at medium (>0.5 and <3 t ha−1 a−1) and high (>3 t ha−1 a−1) erosion sites. Nitrogen leaching could be reduced by up to 28% in areas where leaching is currently estimated high (>100 kg N h−1 a−1), but this was dependent on tree density. With agroforestry, predicted mean carbon sequestration through immobilization in trees, over a 60-year period, ranged from 0.1 to 3.0 t C h−1 a−1 (5–179 t C h−1) depending on tree species and location. Landscape biodiversity was increased by introducing SAF by an average factor of 2.6. The implications of this potential for environmental benefits at Europe

Topics: Alley cropping, Carbon sequestration, Erosion, Landscape diversity, Land use, Nitrogen leaching, Agri-environmental policy
Publisher: Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.07.021
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/3329
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1980). A closed -form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. doi
  2. (2001). Agroforestry and its effects on ecological guilds and arthropod diversity. MSc Thesis. Faculty of Forestry.
  3. (2004). Agroforestry as an approach to minimizing nutrient loss from heavily fertilized soils: The Florida experience. Agroforestry Systems. doi
  4. (1989). Agroforestry for Soil Conservation. doi
  5. (2002). Agroforestry practices, runoff, and nutrient loss: A paired watershed comparison. doi
  6. (2005). Available at: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/guidelin/ch5ref3.pdf
  7. (2000). Competition in tree row agroforestry systems I. Distribution and dynamics of fine root length and biomass. Plant and Soil. doi
  8. (1997). Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input-output combinations. doi
  9. (2003). Conservation of European farmland birds: abundance and species diversity. Ornis Hung.
  10. (2004). Cost estimates for carbon sequestration from fast growing poplar plantations in Canada. Forest Policy and Economics. doi
  11. (1999). Dehesa ecosystem: Production and preservation.
  12. (1999). Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils. doi
  13. (2000). Development of a consistent methodology to derive land cover information on a European scale from remote sensing for environmental modelling. PELCOM project. Final report.
  14. (1993). Diversity Of Airborne Arthropods In A Silvoarable Agroforestry System. doi
  15. (2002). Do field boundaries act as refugia for grassland plant species diversity in intensively managed agricultural landscapes in Britain? doi
  16. (2004). Ecology of tree intercropping systems in the North temperate region: Experiences from southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems. doi
  17. (2000). Economic Dynamics of Tree Planting for Carbon Uptake on Marginal Agricultural Lands. doi
  18. (2006). Erosion processes in steep terrain - Truths, myths, and uncertainties related to forest management in Southeast Asia. Forest Ecology And Management. doi
  19. (2005). for an Albaqualf. doi
  20. (2000). Fuelwood production in agroforestry systems for sustainable land use and CO2-mitigation. doi
  21. (1982). Graphical analysis of annual crop response to fertilizer application. Agricultural Systems. doi
  22. (2001). HyPARv4.1 Model for Agroforestry Systems User Guide. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh. Available at: www.nbu.ac.uk/hypar/
  23. (2002). Interaction between rainfall and nitrogen fertilisation of wheat in environments prone to terminal drought: economic and environmental risk analysis. Field Crops Research. doi
  24. (2006). Methodological approach for the assessment of environmental effects of agroforestry at the landscape scale. doi
  25. (2002). Mitigating Climate Change by planting trees: The transaction costs trap. doi
  26. (2005). Modelling a resource conserving agricultural land use at regional scale. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment.
  27. (1996). Nitrogen balances in long-term field experiments. doi
  28. (1995). Nitrogen Grassland. doi
  29. (2003). Nitrogen leaching losses under a less intensive farming and environment (LIFE) integrated system. doi
  30. (1997). Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE),
  31. (1996). Root distribution of trees and crops: Competition and/or complementary?
  32. (1995). Science in Agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems. doi
  33. (1999). SIG Oleícola Español, MAPYA - Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid. Available at: http://w3.mapya.es/dinatierra_v3/
  34. (1995). Soil Erosion and Conservation. doi
  35. (2000). Soil erosion Risk Assessment in Europe. European Soil Bureau, Space Applications Institute. European Commission.
  36. (2001). Some major developments in soil science since the mid-1960s. doi
  37. (1987). Statistical tools for simulation practicioners.
  38. (2006). Target regions for silvoarable agroforestry in Europe. Ecological Engineering. doi
  39. (1995). The importance of long-term trials in understanding sustainable farming systems: the Rothamsted experience. doi
  40. (1998). Towards Improved Nitrogen Management in Silage Maize Production on Sandy Soils. PhD Thesis.
  41. (1995). USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP):Hillslope Profile and Watershed Model Documentation. NSERL Report #10. USDA-ARS, West Lafayette, 269 pp. Available at: http://topsoil.nserl.purdue.edu/nserlweb/weppmain/docs/readme.htm
  42. (1992). Weather, soil conditions and the interannual variability of herbage production and nutrient uptake on annual Mediterranean pastures. doi
  43. (2004). Working visit report on upscaling for seven landscape test sites in France. Agroscope FAL Reckenholz. Unpublished,
  44. (2004). Working visit report on upscaling for three landscape test sites in The Netherlands. Agroscope FAL Reckenholz. Unpublished,
  45. (2006). Yield-SAFE: a parameter-sparse process-based dynamic model for predicting resource capture, growth and production in agroforestry systems. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.