Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Chemical cleaning of potable microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes

By Nicandro Porcelli

Abstract

Concerns over possible waterborne disease forced drinking water supply companies in England and Wales to adopt microfiltration and ultrafiltration technologies rapidly. MF and UF membrane plants are designed to produce water of a consistent quality regardless of throughput and fluctuations in the feedwater quality. To operate well they need to maintain flux and balance the rate of fouling, and chemical cleaning performance is critical to this. Giant steps have been taken into characterizing the foulants scientifically in the last few years while cleaning is reactive and ad hoc. This thesis explores the basis for a corresponding cleaning science for the technology to develop quantitively. Cleaning performance was defined in terms of a response to combinations of explanatory variables in a materials limited cleaning envelope. The study focused on applying variations of cleanant concentration, applied temperature and soak times to a variety of membranes fouled with different waters and regimes. An experimental design was developed and applied consistently to a number of different sampled sites; allowing an optimised recovery from the polynomial expressions for each treatment, through factorial analysis of the data. The size and variety of the data set analysed allowed comparison and quantification of the different deviations from optimal cleaning response. This effect was seen to vary temporally and with operating regime and the methods usefulness as a practical tool in the membrane plant lifecycle was considered. Cost evaluation of the variation in cleaning response showed that sub-optimal cleaning costs and energy use may be significant and the thesis also illustrated how module geometry affects initial cake deposition and thus cleanability. By demonstrating the potential for cleaning factor analysis, the potential for a combined heuristic and predictive cleaning control science is possible, but will need new strategies to manage technology change

Publisher: Cranfield University
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/4659
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). Assessing Capital Efficiency in The Water and Sewerage Industry in England and Wales: OFWAT’s Approach: Capital Efficiency and Infrastructure Regulation. doi
  2. (2008). A Retrospective look at A Behavioural Theory of the Firm. doi
  3. (1991). Sample Survey Principles and Methods, doi
  4. (1999). Knowledge Transfer Through Technological Hyperlearning in Five Industries. doi
  5. (2002). Is Technological Learning A Firm Core Competence, When, How And Why? A Longitudinal, Multi-Industry Study Of Firm Technological Learning And Market Performance. doi
  6. (2006). Water Regulation and Sustainability 1997-2001: Adoption Or Adaptation? doi
  7. (2009). Cave Review: Independent Review of Competition and Innovation in Water Markets: Final report.
  8. (2007). The Application of Cognitive Mapping Methodologies in Project Management Research. doi
  9. (2006). 172Chapter 8: Innovation in the UK Water Industry and Membrane Plant Implementation in
  10. (1997). The Assessment: Introducing Competition into Regulated Industries. doi
  11. (2006). House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. Water Management: Volume 1 HL Paper 191-II Section 3.72. London: The Stationary Office (UK)
  12. (2004). A Conceptual Model of "Receptivity" Applied to the Design and Deployment of Water Policy Mechanisms. Environmental Sciences; doi
  13. (2004). Membrane Treatment Technical Guidance Document
  14. (2004). Membrane Treatment: Technical Guidance Document DW/14A.
  15. (2003). Thinking about Technology: Understanding the Role of Cognition and Technical Change. doi
  16. (2004). Organizational Culture As A Knowledge Repository For Increased Innovative Capacity. doi
  17. (2008). Materiality and Change: Challenges To Building Better Theory About Technology And Organizing. doi
  18. (2002). 173Chapter 8: Innovation in the UK Water Industry and Membrane Plant Implementation in
  19. (2008). Some Alternative Approaches to Utility Regulation. doi
  20. (2005). Ch.7 Building a Learning Oganisation in a Project-Based
  21. (1978). The doi
  22. (2006). Review of the Impact of the 1999 Water Regulation in Reducing Cryptosporidium Contamination Risk in Groundwater Public Supplies, doi
  23. (2007). Knowledge-Creating Company. doi
  24. (1992). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. doi
  25. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. doi
  26. (2006). Integration of Membrane Filtration into Water treatment Systems,
  27. (2006). 174Chapter 8: Innovation in the UK Water Industry and Membrane Plant Implementation in
  28. (1993). The Development and Application of Interactive Models doi
  29. (1985). A Theory of Yardstick Competition. doi
  30. (1996). Assessing AMT Implementations: An Empirical Field Study. doi
  31. (2001). How Organizations Learn from Success and Failure,
  32. (1992). Organizational Decision-Making In The Appropriation Of Technological Innovation: Cognitive And Political Dimensions, doi
  33. (2005). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technical Market and Organisational Change.
  34. (1995). Inward Technology Transfer As An Interactive Process. doi
  35. (2006). 175Chapter 8: Innovation in the UK Water Industry and Membrane Plant Implementation
  36. (2006). Barriers to Innovation in the Water Sector: Output from the
  37. A Road Map of Strategic R&D
  38. (2007). HR Perceptions and the Provision of Workforce Training in an AMT Environment. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.