Location of Repository

Social enterprises and NEETs: ethical and effective entrepreneurial skills programmes?

By Simon Denny, Richard Hazenberg and Frederick A Seddon


If young people not in employment, education or training (NEET) participate in Entrepreneurial Skills Programmes (ESPs), delivered by social enterprises, there is an ethical responsibility to measure the outcomes of these programmes. So called "hard‟ outcomes, such as new businesses created or jobs secured, are self evident but potential "soft‟ outcomes, such as attitude to enterprise or general self-efficacy, are less evident. This exploratory study aimed to develop evaluation techniques for the assessment of "soft‟ outcomes on participants after completing a six-week ESP delivered by a work-integration social enterprise (WISE

Topics: HF1106, HD60, HB615, HF5381
OAI identifier: oai:nectar.northampton.ac.uk:2758
Provided by: NECTAR

Suggested articles



  1. (1977). Attitude-behaviour relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. doi
  2. (2002). Attitudes to Education and Choices at Age 16: A Brief Research Review, DfES Research Report, Department for Education and Skills,
  3. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide, Falmer Press: London and
  4. (2008). Business development success in SMEs: a case study approach, doi
  5. (2003). Creative thinking processes in adolescent computer-based composition: An analysis of strategies adopted and the influence of formal instrumental training, doi
  6. (1999). Destination Unknown: Engaging with the Problems of Marginalised Youth,
  7. (1998). Dispositional Effects on Job and Life: The Role of Core Evaluations, doi
  8. (1994). Doing Counselling Research, doi
  9. (2004). Empathetic Creativity: the product of empathetic attunement,
  10. (1990). Encouraging enterprise: Britain‟s graduate enterprise program,
  11. (2007). Entrepreneurship education in UK business schools: a longitudinal perspective”, doi
  12. (2005). Entrepreneurship education in UK business schools: conceptual, contextual and policy considerations”, doi
  13. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: can business schools meet the challenge?” doi
  14. (2003). Entrepreneurship education: emerging trends and challenges for the 21 st century”, Coleman Foundation White Paper Series, Coleman Foundation,
  15. (2006). Global entrepreneurship monitor doi
  16. (2003). Managing and Measuring Social Enterprises, doi
  17. (2009). Measuring Enterprise Potential in Young People, Entrepreneurship, doi
  18. (2005). Measuring entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Paper presented at the EDGE conference: “Bridging the gap: Entrepreneurship in theory and practice”.
  19. (2006). Measuring General Self-Efficacy: A Comparison of Three Measures using Item-Response Theory, doi
  20. (1996). Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education”, paper presented at the National Academy of Management Association Meeting,
  21. (1989). Modern psychometrics: The science of psychological assessment. doi
  22. (2005). Modes of communication during jazz improvisation. doi
  23. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry, doi
  24. (2006). Not a Very NEET Solution: Representing Problematic Labour Market Transitions among Early School Leavers, doi
  25. (2006). Not So NEET? A Critique of the Use of „NEET‟ in Setting Targets for Interventions with Young People, doi
  26. (2010). Reducing the numbers of young people not in education, employment or training: what works and why. Reference no: 090236 Ofsted publications:
  27. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings, doi
  28. (1992). Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of its Determinants and Malleability, doi
  29. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, doi
  30. (2000). SME policy, academic research and the growth of ignorance: Mythical concepts, myths, assumptions, rituals and confusions, doi
  31. (2006). Social Enterprise Typology (revised edition), Virtue Ventures:
  32. (2008). Social Enterprise: Diversity doi
  33. (1997). Teaching entrepreneurship in Asia: impact of a pedagogical innovation”,
  34. (2005). The best of intentions: future plans of Young Enterprise Scheme participants, doi
  35. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory, doi
  36. (1993). The enterprise culture and education, doi
  37. (2009). The impact of entrepreneurial programmes: Lessons from examining self-efficacy.
  38. (2008). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial outcomes, doi
  39. (1982). The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation, doi
  40. (1991). training for entrepreneurship: Swedish approaches”, doi
  41. (2001). Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale, Organisational Research Methods, doi
  42. (2004). What is “enterprise education”? An analysis of the objectives and methods of enterprise education programmes in four European countries. doi
  43. (2000). Where do they come from? Prevalence & doi
  44. (1989). Young People and Enterprise: A National Survey,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.