Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Behaviour of semi-rigid composite connections for steel framed buildings

By D Muniasamy

Abstract

During propped construction the steel-concrete composite action resists dead as well as imposed loads. Conversely, the steel section alone resists the floor self-weight in unpropped beams. The major difference between propped and unpropped composite beams lies in the ductility requirements rather than in the strength requirements. Relatively few studies have been carried out to assess the rotation requirements for unpropped semi-continuous composite beams. The outstanding critical factor in the case of unpropped construction is the dead load stress that must be carried by the steel beam alone prior to hardening of the concrete. This research overcomes the difficulties involved in modelling the composite and noncomposite stages by using a numerical integration technique developed from the basic principles of structural mechanics. The method incorporates the fully non-linear material properties and requires very little assumption. The technique was initially validated using the experimental results from plain steel beam bending tests. The subsequent comparison between the model predictions and the results from the large-scale frame test carried out for this research purpose, showed that the method is capable of predicting non-elastic load vs. end rotation behaviour within a high degree of accuracy. Thus the model can be used with confidence in order to predict the connection rotation requirements for a wider range of loading configurations than is practically possible from experimental testing alone. A parametric study is carried out using the numerical integration technique developed for the semi-continuous composite beam on a total of 2160 different beam configurations, utilising different steel grades and loading conditions. In this study the influence of dead load stress on the connection rotation requirement has been thoroughly evaluated along with several other factors including span to depth ratio, location within the building frame, ratio between the support (connection) moment capacity and span (beam) moment capacity, loading type, steel grade and percentage of the beam strength utilised during design. The connection rotation capacity requirements resulting from this study are assessed to establish the scope for extending the use of composite connections to unpropped beams. The large-scale experiment that has been carried out provided an opportunity to investigate the behaviour of a modified form of composite connection detail for use at perimeter columns (single-sided composite connections) with improved rebar anchorage. Additionally, another extensive parametric study is carried out using the numerical integration technique developed for the steel beam to establish the influence of strainhardening on elastic-plastic frame instability design

Topics: Composite materials, Steel, Structural, Building, Iron and steel, Joints (Engineering)
Publisher: Engineering systems department
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/3974
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. 1). Joints in simple construction,
  2. A Practical Method for the Design of I-Beams Haunched in Concrete.
  3. (1992). A review of Eurocode 4: Part I for y, s Department of engineering,
  4. (1981). A Semi-Rigid Design Method for Composite Frames,
  5. (1998). An analysis of the true bending strength of steel beams. Structures and Buildings. Proceeding of the. doi
  6. (1986). Analysis and tests of flexibly connected steel frames". doi
  7. (2002). Analysis of strain hardening in steel beams using mill tests. doi
  8. (1976). Applicability of simple plastic theory to continuous composite beams. doi
  9. (1991). Available rotation capacity in steel and composite beame'.
  10. (1994). Behaviour of composite connections in steel and concrete doi
  11. (1994). Behaviour of Composite Connections in Steel and Concrete, PhD Thesis, doi
  12. (1996). Behaviour of Flush End-plate Composite Connections with Unbalanced Moment and Variable Shear/Moment Ratios-4. Experimental Behaviour", doi
  13. (1996). Behaviour of Flush End-plate Composite Connections with Unbalanced Moment and Variable Shear/Moment Ratios-41. Prediction of Moment Capacity", doi
  14. (1987). Behaviour of semi-rigid composite connections".
  15. (1987). Behaviour of semi-rigid composite frame, composite steel structures: advance, design and construction, edited by
  16. Blackwell Scientific Publications,
  17. (1988). BS 4449: Specificationfor carbon steel barsfor the reinforcement of concrete.
  18. (1990). BS 5950: Part 3.1, Code of practice for design of simple and continuous composite beams,
  19. (1990). BS 5950: Structural use of steelwork in building, part 1: Code of practice for design in simple and continuous construction: hot rolled sections. doi
  20. (1990). BS 5950: Structural use ofsteelwork in building, part 1: 1990: Code of practicefor design in simple and continuous construction: hot rolled sections.
  21. (1997). BS 8110: Structural use ofconcrete, part 1: 1997., Code ofpracticefor design and construction.
  22. (1984). BS5400: Steel, concrete and composite bridges. doi
  23. (2002). Composite connections at perimeter locations in unpropped composite floors, doi
  24. (1992). Composite Frame Construction,
  25. (1992). Composite heams.
  26. (1997). Composite joints for semicontinuous framing,
  27. (1995). Composite steel and concrete structural members, doi
  28. (1994). Constructing ne Team, Final Report of the Government Industry Review
  29. (1987). Continuous construction in steel for roofs and composite floors",
  30. (1993). Design of composite connections - interim guidance for end-plat lype connections.
  31. (1999). Design of composite joints for buildings, doi
  32. (1992). Design of connections in the Eureka Cimsteel project, Connections in steel structures IP behaviour, strength
  33. (1995). Design of continuous composite beams allowing for rotation capaci! y. Thesis No. 1308, Ecole Polytechnique Federale,
  34. (1997). Design of semi-continuous braced frames,
  35. (1994). Design of semi-rigid composite beam-column connections. Building thefiture:
  36. (2000). Design Rotation Capacity of Composite Joints",
  37. (1995). Determination of rotation capacity requirements for steel and composite beams". doi
  38. (1966). Discussion of Home and Medland, Proceeding of the. Institution of Civil Engineers,
  39. (1997). Ductile steel-concrete composite joints, Composite construction-Conventional and innovative,
  40. (1997). Ductile steel-concrete composite joints.
  41. (1999). Ductilily reguirements for composite connections,
  42. (2000). Ductilily requirements for composite connections, Draft paper, The Steel Construction Institute.
  43. (1990). EN10025: Hot rolled products for non-alloy structural steels", European Committee for Standardisation,
  44. (1992). End plate connections and their influence on steel and composite structures PhD Thesis,
  45. Eurocode 2: Desian of concrete structures: doi
  46. (1998). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures: Part: 1.1 General rules and rules for buildinjzs/A2 doi
  47. (1997). European Co-operation in the field of scientific & technical research: Semi-rigid behaviour of civil engineering structural connections, Composite steel-concrete joints in braced frames for buildings. Editor Anderson, D., Luxembourg, European Commission.
  48. European Convention for Constructional Steelwork: ECCS - doi
  49. (1964). Experimental tests on composite beams".
  50. (1965). Flexural strength of steel-composite beams".
  51. (1989). Frame analysis and the link between connection behaviour andftame performance: Frame and slab structure - Chapter 3, edited by
  52. (1966). Frame instability and strain hardening in plastic theory".
  53. Full scale testing on composite multi-storey structures". The structural enginee ,
  54. (1990). In plane stability in portal frames".
  55. (1970). Innovations in Composite Floor Systems.
  56. (1992). Insitu testing of a composite floor system", The structural engýtllneer,
  57. (1960). Instability and the plastic theory of structures,
  58. (1998). Joints in steel construction - composite connections. The Steel Construction Institute. Publication No.
  59. (1995). Joints in steel construction - moment connections. The Steel Construction Institute, Publication No.
  60. (1977). Limit state design method for the tension region of bolted beam-column connections",
  61. (1991). Local buckling and moment redistribution doi
  62. (1972). Local buckling in continuous composite beams".
  63. (1997). Material and geometric properties of structural steel for use in design".
  64. (1998). Modelling of beam-to-column joints, doi
  65. (2004). Modelling of unpropped semi-continuous composite beams". doi
  66. (1995). Moment connections in composite construction: Interim guidance for end-12late connections,
  67. Moment redistribution in fixed ended beam Computer program,
  68. (1993). Moment-curvature relations for steel and composite beams. doi
  69. (1995). Numerical modelling of composite flush end-plate connections".
  70. (1992). Partial strength moment resisting connections in composite frames.
  71. (1992). Partial strength moment resisting connections in composite frames. The Steel Construction Institute,
  72. (1992). Partial strength moment resisting connections in compositefirames,
  73. (1994). Performance of composite connections: major axis end plate joints"I doi
  74. (1988). Plastic collapse load of continuous composite plate girders".
  75. (1981). Plastic design of low-rise frames. doi
  76. Plastic design of portal frames in steel to doi
  77. (1995). Prediction Method for Moment-Rotation Behaviour of Composite Beam to Steel Column Connection. doi
  78. (1997). Prediction of Initial Stiffness and Available Rotation Capacity of Major Axis Composite Flush Endplate Connectione', doi
  79. (1987). Quantifying ductility in continuous composite beams, doi
  80. (1990). Quantifying limit-states of rotation capacity in flexural members. doi
  81. (1994). Recent tests on steel and composite connections in France,
  82. (1979). Redistribution in composite beams".
  83. (2001). Required and available rotations in continuous composite beams with semi-rigid connections. doi
  84. (1996). Required rotation composite connections, The Steel Construction Institute, doi
  85. (2000). Required rotation of composite connections". doi
  86. (1995). Required rotations and moment redistribution for composite frames and continuous beams". doi
  87. (1989). Roark'sformulasfor stress and strain. 6h Edition,
  88. (1957). Rotation capacity of a continuous beam, Fritz engineering laboratory report,
  89. (1987). Rotational stiffness characteristics of steel beam-to-column connections. doi
  90. (1993). SCI-P-055: Design of composite slabs and beams with steel deckin The Steel Construction Institute.
  91. (2002). Second-order elastic-plastic analysis of plane frames". doi
  92. (1990). Semi-rigid action of composite joints",
  93. (1989). Semi-Rigid Composite Joints, Structural ConnectionsStability and Strength, Chapter 3, edited by
  94. (1987). Semi-rigid composite steel frames", doi
  95. (1995). Semi-rigid joint action and the design of non-sway composite frames",
  96. (1981). Semi-rigid Joints for Composite Frames,
  97. (1988). Simplified modelling of material non-linearity in structural frames,
  98. (1987). Strength of beam-columns in flexibly connected steel frames PhD Thesis, Department of civil and structural engineering,
  99. (1995). Tension Region in the Panel Zone of a Composite Joint.
  100. (1961). Tests of composite beams with stud shear connectors".
  101. (1976). Tests on three three-span continuous composite beams. doi
  102. (1994). The analysis and ductilily requirements of semi-rigid composite frames.
  103. (1966). The collapse loads of steel frameworks, Proceeding ofthe. doi
  104. (1998). The development of a design guide for standardised composite connections", doi
  105. (1963). The steel skeleton. Volume 11. Plastic behaviour and design.
  106. (1990). The strength of biaxially loaded beam-columns in flexibly connected steel frames,
  107. (1899). The strength ofmaterials,
  108. (1987). The Use of Profiled Steel Sheeting in Floor Construction", doi
  109. (1995). Verifying the performance of standard ductile connections for semi-continuous frames, doi
  110. (1993). Zur Schubtraafahigkeit von Verbundknoten.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.