This research concerns relationships between effective IR and stock pricing and
stock liquidity and analyst coverage. This thesis develops the IR literature by
using an original and focused measure of IR performance, numbers of firms'
nominations for the Investor Relations Magazine IR awards 1999-2002, and by
testing for any direct relationships between firms' number of award nominations
and stock price, liquidity and analyst coverage over periods surrounding these
awards and by exploring a wider range of firm characteristics compared to
existing research.
It is motivated by a seminal paper claiming that effective IR indirectly reduces the
cost of equity capital, based a chain of existing research (Brennan and
Tamaronski, 2000). Firstly, effective IR increases analyst coverage by reducing
analysts' information-search costs, (Bhushan, 1989b, Lang and Lundholm, 1996,
Francis, Hannah and Philbrick, 1997, Holland 1998b). Higher coverage can
directly reduce information asymmetry and trading costs, increasing liquidity and
indirectly increasing equity trading volumes (Brennan and Subrahmanyan, 1996).
Finally, Amihud, Mendelson and Lauterbach (1997) show a direct inverse
relationship between stock liquidity and stock prices, thus completing the putative
chain between effective IR and a reduced cost of equity.
However, any research showing a direct relationship between effective IR and
the cost of capital is limited, with Botosan (1997) only finding a direct negative
relationship for a sample of US firms with effective annual reports and low
analyst coverage, and more recent research by Botosan and Plumlee (2002)
shows no relationship to firms' IR ratings from analysts of the Association of
Investment Management and Research (AIMR).
I find, firstly, that prior to the IR awards the smaller-sized firms earn excess
equity returns and a positive relationship between the number of firms' IR award
nominations and prior analyst coverage. Secondly, I find that subsequent to the
IR awards the firms continue to have high levels of analyst coverage, but do not
earn excess stock returns. These findings suggest that analysts cover high
momentum small-firm stocks and generally follow firms with effective IR, and also
contributes to other research on prior factors that appear to influence firms'
ratings in subjective firm-surveys, which behavioural finance attributes to the
survey respondents' psychological preferences and biases.
Finally, I find that effective IR is associated with a subsequent significant
increase in stock liquidity and a reduced cost of equity, consistent with
information risk and agency theories, which predict that effective IR will reduce
risks attached to stocks due to high information asymmetry
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.