Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

NP animacy identification for anaphora resolution

By Constantin Orasan and Richard Evans


In anaphora resolution for English, animacy identification can play an integral role in the application of agreement restrictions between pronouns and candidates, and as a result, can improve the accuracy of anaphora resolution systems. In this paper, two methods for animacy identification are proposed and evaluated using intrinsic and extrinsic measures. The first method is a rule-based one which uses information about the unique beginners in WordNet to classify NPs on the basis of their animacy. The second method relies on a machine learning algorithm which exploits a WordNet enriched with animacy information for each sense. The effect of word sense disambiguation on the two methods is also assessed. The intrinsic evaluation reveals that the machine learning method reaches human levels of performance. The extrinsic evaluation demonstrates that animacy identification can be beneficial in anaphora resolution, especially in the cases where animate entities are identified with high precision

Topics: Anaphora resolution, Animacy identification, Artificial Intelligence
Publisher: American Association for Artificial Intelligence
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). 102NP Animacy Identification for Anaphora Resolution
  2. (1987). A centering approach to pronouns. doi
  3. (2002). A corpus based analysis of morphological disagreement in anaphora resolution.
  4. (2002). A new, fully automatic version of Mitkov’s knowledge-poor pronoun resolution method. doi
  5. (1997). A non-projective dependency parser. doi
  6. (1994). An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution.
  7. (2000). An empirical investigation of the relation between discourse structure and co-reference. doi
  8. (2002). Anaphora resolution. doi
  9. (1998). Automatic resolution of anaphora in English.
  10. (1998). Building semantic concordances.
  11. (1993). C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. doi
  12. (1995). Disambiguating noun groupings with respect to Wordnet senses. In doi
  13. (1996). Evaluating natural language processing systems: an analysis and review. doi
  14. (1998). Feature mismatches and anaphora resolution.
  15. (1982). Frequency Analysis of English Usage.
  16. (1998). Getting useful gender statistics from English text.
  17. (2000). Improving anaphora resolution by identifying animate entities in texts.
  18. (2002). Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. doi
  19. (1999). Noun phrase coreference as clustering.
  20. (1978). Pronoun resolution. doi
  21. (1976). Pronoun resolution. Research report 76-1,
  22. (1998). Robust pronoun resolution with limited knowledge. doi
  23. (1995). Statistics for the social sciences. doi
  24. (2000). TiMBL: Tilburg memory based learner, version 3.0, reference guide, ilk technical report 00-01. Ilk 00-01,
  25. (1998). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.