Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Morphological and physico-chemical properties of British aquatic habitats potentially exposed to pesticides.

By Colin D. Brown, Nigel Turner, John Hollis, Patricia H. Bellamy, Jeremy Biggs, Penny Williams, Dave Arnold, Tim Pepper and Steve Maund

Abstract

Approaches to describe the exposure of non-target aquatic organisms to agricultural pesticides can be limited by insufficient knowledge of the environmental conditions where the compounds are used. This study analysed information from national and regional datasets gathered in the UK describing the morphological and physico-chemical properties of rivers, streams, ponds and ditches. An aggregation approach was adopted, whereby the landscape was divided into 12 hydrogeological classes for agricultural areas and a 13th class that comprised non-agricultural land. The data describe major differences in the abundance, dimensions and chemistry of waterbodies in the different landscapes. There is almost an order of magnitude difference in the total input of pesticide per unit area between the different landscapes. Ditches are shown to be most proximate to arable land, streams and rivers intermediate and ponds the least proximate. Results of the study have implications for the development of standard scenarios for use in protective screening steps within the risk assessment. Data can be used to produce more realistic estimates of the exposure of aquatic systems to pesticides and to examine how that exposure varies across the landscape

Topics: Landscape, Waterbody, Risk assessment, Database
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.015
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/3325
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). 100 statistical tests: 2 nd ed.
  2. (2000). Assessing stock and change in land cover and biodiversity in GB: an introduction to Countryside Survey doi
  3. (2001). Characterizing agrochemical patterns and effective BMPs for surface waters using mechanistic modeling and GIS.
  4. FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2 p245; available at http://viso.ei.jrc.it/focus/.
  5. (2003). Landscape-level risk assessment for pesticides.
  6. (2001). Modeling pesticide losses from diffuse sources in Germany. Water Sci Technol 44:189-196. Biggs
  7. (2002). Predicting runoff-induced pesticide input in agricultural sub-catchment surface waters: linking catchment variables and contamination. doi
  8. (2003). Probabilistic assessment of pesticide risks to birds. doi
  9. (2001). Probabilistic risk assessment for pesticides in Europe: implementation & research needs.
  10. (2001). Probabilistic risk assessment of cotton pyrethroids: III. A spatial analysis of the Missouri USA cotton landscape. doi
  11. (2001). Probabilistic risk assessment of cotton pyrethroids: IV. Landscape-level exposure characterization. doi
  12. (1999). Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment: a handbook for dealing with variability and uncertainty in models and inputs. doi
  13. (1998). The development of a hydrological classification of UK soils and the inherent scale changes. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 50:299-302. Mackney et al doi
  14. (1994). The land cover map of Great Britain – an automated classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper date. Photogramm Eng Rem S 60:553-562.Giddings JM; Brock TCM; Heger W; Heimbach F; Maund SJ; Norman SM; Ratte HT; Schäfers C; Streloke M

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.