Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Victim pressure, institutional inertia and climate change adaptation: the case of flood risk

By Tim Harries and Edmund Penning-Rowsell

Abstract

Interviews were conducted with risk managers in a case-study area in England to determine the factors influencing the choice between more traditional, engineering based, adaptation to flood risk and those focussing on vulnerability reduction. The findings of in-depth analysis of these interviews have implications for climate change adaptation as a whole. They suggest that government policies to implement a broader range of adaptation measures might be hampered by institutional cultures formed when engineered approaches were the norm. Political decentralisation and the fashion for public consultation exacerbate this effect, leaving decision-makers more responsive to the influence of those directly affected by natural hazards than they are to policy pronouncements by government

Topics: geography, sociology
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.kingston.ac.uk:18065

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1991). A public management for all seasons?
  2. (1984). A theoretical and experimental approach to the study of social representations in a situation of interaction. In
  3. (2005). Adaptation to climate change: Perspectives across scales.
  4. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein.
  5. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward doi
  6. (1990). An Introduction to the Social Identity Approach. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.
  7. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. doi
  8. (1979). Backward mapping. doi
  9. (2008). Designing sustainable coastal futures.
  10. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour.
  11. (2002). Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
  12. (2006). Fair adaptation to climate change.
  13. (2008). Feeling secure or being secure? Why it can seem better not to protect yourself against a natural hazard.
  14. (1999). Flood and Coastal Defence Project Appraisal Guidance: 3 Economic Appraisal. Ministry for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries,
  15. (2005). Floods as catalysts for policy change: Historical lessons from England and Wales.
  16. (1998). Floods: Final Assessment by the Independent Review Team. Environment Agency,
  17. (2004). Foresight. Future Flooding. Scientific Summary: Volume I – Future Risks and their Drivers.
  18. (1997). From marketization to diplomacy: It‟s the mix that matters.
  19. (1962). Hazard and Choice Perception in Flood Plain Management.
  20. (2008). Householder Responses to Flood Risk: The Consequences of the Search for Ontological Security (PhD thesis).
  21. (1962). How to Do Things with Words.
  22. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement.
  23. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program.
  24. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution.
  25. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.
  26. (1995). Interpretations of Calamity: From the Viewpoint of Human Ecology. Allen and Unwin,
  27. (1983). Introduction: From technology to environment. Pp 13-17 in
  28. (2000). Is the British state hollowing out?
  29. (2007). It‟ll never happen to me‟: Understanding public awareness of local flood risk.
  30. (2008). Learning Lessons from the 2007 Floods: An Independent Review by Sir Michael Pitt. Cabinet Office,
  31. (2007). Lower Thames Strategy Study Phase 3: Draft Executive Summary. Revision A01. Environment Agency,
  32. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. doi
  33. (2006). Multi-faceted justice in adaptation to climate change. In
  34. (2007). Natural and imposed injustices: The challenges in implementing 'fair' flood risk management policy in England.
  35. (1971). Natural hazard in human ecological perspective: Hypotheses and models.
  36. (2006). People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. doi
  37. (2002). Re-thinking the Diversity of Knowledge: Cognitive Polyphasia, Belief and Representation [online]. London:
  38. (2008). Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
  39. (1994). Shifting fortunes of the elderly: The comparative politics of retrenchment.
  40. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour.
  41. (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations.
  42. (1988). Sovereignty: An institutional perspective.
  43. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality.
  44. (1992). State formation and social policy in the United States.
  45. (1993). Strategy for Flood and Coastal Defence in England and Wales: Executive Summary. Environment Agency,
  46. (1979). Street Level Bureaucracy. Russel Sage Foundation,
  47. (2007). Systematisation of Existing Flood Risk Management Concepts (FLOOD-ERA working paper). Flood Hazard Research Centre,
  48. (2008). Systematisation, Evaluation and Context Conditions of Structural and Non-Structural Measures for Flood Risk Reduction, FLOOD-ERA joint report. ERA-NET CRUE,
  49. (2008). Systematisation, Evaluation and Context Conditions of Structural and Non-Structural Measures for Flood Risk Reduction: FLOOD-ERA Report for England and Scotland.
  50. (2006). The health effects of flooding: Social research results from England and Wales.
  51. (2008). The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain.
  52. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government.
  53. (1997). The post-modern condition.
  54. (2008). The role of insurers in promoting adaptation to the impacts of climate change.
  55. (2006). Toward justice in adaptation to climate change.
  56. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life.
  57. (2009). Understanding and enhancing the public's behavioural response to flood warning information.
  58. (2010). What really determines policy? An evaluation of outcome measures for prioritising flood and coastal risk management investment in England.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.