Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Air Traffic Control automation: for humans or people?

By Peter Brooker

Abstract

Are air traffic controllers humans or people? At first sight, this seems a very odd question, given that ‘humans’ and ‘people’ are near-synonyms in the dictionary and everyday usage. However, in research on air traffic control (ATC) automation the phrase ‘human-centred’ is used to mean particular aspects of people: for example, it does not usually address their motivations for embracing change or cover organisational behaviour issues. The objective here is to try to understand how the fact that air traffic controllers are people – particular kinds of people – is likely to affect the introduction of automation. This examination takes as an example a suite of computer assistance tools for en route ATC. How would these tools need to change if the fact that controllers are ‘people’ is taken into account

Publisher: Ashgate Publishing
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/2203
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2001). 5222 - 1 - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. http://www.ath.cena.fr/pages/4publ/air_traffic_automation.pdf
  2. (1977). Activity interests and occupational choice. Chicago, Science Research Associates.Air Traffic Control automation: for humans or people? 19 Lauche,
  3. (2000). ATM support tools in PHARE – the importance of matching the concepts of management or control.
  4. (2003). Automation Issues doi
  5. (2003). Control Workload, Airspace Capacity and Future Systems. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety,
  6. (2003). CORA COnflict Resolution Assistant: Human Factors Lab experiments.
  7. (1951). Human engineering for an effective air navigation and traffic control system. Ohio state University Foundation Report,
  8. (1991). Human-centered aircraft automation: a concept and guidelines.
  9. (1983). Ironies of Automation. doi
  10. (2001). No 367. http://www.eurocontrol.int/eec/publications/eecreports /2001/367.pdf Printemps,
  11. (2000). Role of the Human in the Evolution of ATM (RHEA). Final Report. NLR: Netherlands. http://europa.eu.int/comm/transport/extra/web /downloadfunction.cfm?docname=200310/rhearep.pdfandapptype=application/ pdf Pavet,
  12. (2000). Social Factors in Air Traffic Control Simulation.
  13. (1995). The Future of Air Traffic Control: Human Operators doi
  14. (2005). The Things they do for Love. Harvard Business Review,
  15. (1976). Zur empirischen Untersuchung verschiedener Formen von Arbeitszufriedenheit. Zeitschrift für
  16. (1974). Zur Unterscheidung verschiedener Formen von ‘Arbeitszufriedenheit’.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.