Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Configuring in high velocity error sensitive circumstances: A grounded study

By Malcolm Young

Abstract

The operational reliability of organizations that deal on a routine basis with very dynamic circumstances has been a rich domain of study for organizational scholars for many years. Increasing reliance on the application of complex technologies and human processes in a range of social endeavour provokes our need to understand the attributes of such processes. Traditional contingency theoretic perspectives tend to produce archetypal resolutions that identify in rather specific terms what organizational forms can be matched with particular environmental characteristics. But as the organizational environment becomes more dynamic this approach seems less credible. This research therefore moves beyond the search for archetypes to investigate the processes by which resources are configured in order to deal with dynamic circumstances. Further, with self-managed teams increasingly acknowledged to be central to performance, contributing to fast, flexible and creative action and therefore used as the fundamental work group, this study focuses on the meso-level of the team. This helps to limit the scope of the research task while still offering opportunities for good theoretical and practical contribution. Adopting a grounded, qualitative methodology it triangulates evidence from three dissimilar domains (accident and emergency, air traffic control and fire service) that share a common context of unpredictability, high velocity and error sensitivity. The findings identify a specific type of situated behaviour, termed agile configuration, by which team members configure remarkably flexible and reliable behaviours in very dynamic situations, suggesting an almost limitless range of potential configuring behaviours that avoid the limitations of configurational archetypes. The adduced models and explanations provide theoretical insights that increase understanding of behaviour in extreme contingencies and therefore advance traditional contingency theoretic perspectives, with particular relevance for concepts of dynamic capability. These outcomes also have practical potential for the development of agile configuration competence in self managed teams and larger organizational groupings

Publisher: Cranfield University
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/1654
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2005). Bricolage in organizations’ FUENL Working Paper Series, No 474, Universidad Nova de
  2. (2004). Departmental Report doi
  3. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?’ Strategic Management Review, doi
  4. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic enquiry’, Education Communication and Technology, doi
  5. (2001). Ethnographic approaches to the study of organizations’, in doi
  6. (1997). Grounded Theory doi
  7. (1974). Learning in extreme situations’ Warwick Working Papers,
  8. (1952). Man on the Assembly Line, doi
  9. (1995). Measuring agility: the toil of turmoil’,
  10. (1936). On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem’, doi
  11. (1976). Organizational Structure in its Context: The Aston Programme, Gower, London doi
  12. (1991). Organizations: Theory
  13. (1978). Power, Innovation And Problem Solving In Management, McGraw-Hill, London Levi-Strauss, C.
  14. (1998). Practice improvisation’, doi
  15. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. doi
  16. (2002). Routines: A brief history of the concept’, doi
  17. (1991). Strategic improvising: How to formulate and implement competitive strategies in concert’, Organizational Dynamics doi
  18. (2001). Strategy as simple rules’, Harvard Business Review
  19. (1998). Surety of the Nations Critical Infrastructures, Sandia National Laboratories, PO Box 5800,
  20. (1999). Tacit knowledge in teaching: folk pedagogy and teacher education’, in
  21. (2000). Teamworking and employee involvement: terminology, evaluation and context’,
  22. (1949). The Concept of Mind, doi
  23. (1994). The evolution of dissipative social systems’, doi
  24. (1972). The History of Management Thought,
  25. (1992). Toward a theory of corporate coherence: Some preliminary remarks'
  26. (1995). Towards a Science of the doi
  27. (2001). What is tacit knowledge?’ in

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.