Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Broadening visions of BPR : the imperative of strategic integration

By Joe Peppard

Abstract

This paper calls for BPR to adopt a more strategic context suggesting that such a strategic perspective must be adopted if progress is to be made. In order to frame this position, the paper first takes the reader on an excursion through the BPR literature beginning by briefly examining how BPR has developed over the last five years and focusing on some of the central debates. Second, it suggests that BPR is broadening in perspective and examines developments which are contributing to a new conceptualisation. Finally, the paper points to the need for greater strategic integration, a call which is being highlighted by organisations’ experiences with BPR. However, in order to achieve this the paper proposes the need to articulate a process theory of the firm.School of Managemen

Topics: Business process re-engineering
Year: 1995
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/1172
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1972). A garbage can model of organisational choice’, doi
  2. (1993). A new approach to business processes’,
  3. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm’, doi
  4. (1965). Applying organisational change in industry: structural, technological and humanistic approaches’,
  5. (1994). Authors split over concept: pair part ways on re-engineering’, The Houston Chronicle,
  6. (1993). Beyond business process redesign: redefining Baxter’s business network’, Sloan Management Review,
  7. (1991). Beyond re-engineering: the three phases of business transformation’, doi
  8. (1991). Business Process Improvement: The Breakthrough Strategy for Total Quality, Productivity and Competitiveness,
  9. Business process redesign: hype, hope or hypocrisy’, doi
  10. (1994). Business Process Reengineering: Breakpoint Strategies For Market Dominance, doi
  11. (1995). Business process reengineering: help or hinder’, doi
  12. (1994). Business process reengineering: improving in new strategic directions’, doi
  13. (1993). Business Process Reengineering: Tactics for Managing Radical Change, Working Paper,
  14. (1995). Changing the role of top management: beyond structure to process,
  15. (1994). Competing for the future’, doi
  16. (1993). Continuous strategic alignment: exploiting information technology capabilities for competitive success’ doi
  17. (1987). Electronic markets and hierarchies’, doi
  18. (1995). Exploring Business Process Re-engineering: Current Perspective and Research Directions,
  19. (1993). Fast Cycle Time: How to Afigh Purpose, Strategy, and Structure fir Speed,
  20. (1994). Forging a link between business strategy and business re-engineering’, doi
  21. (1994). From job-based to competency-based organizations’, doi
  22. (1994). From lean production to the lean enterprise’, doi
  23. (1993). From value chain to value constellation: designing interactive strategy’, doi
  24. (1956). General systems theory’,
  25. (1993). Getting ready for strategic change: surviving business process redesign’, Information Systems Management, Summer, doi
  26. (1994). Hammer defends re-engineering’, The Economist,
  27. (1994). How new is business process redesign?’ doi
  28. (1994). Information systems, operational research and business reengineering’, doi
  29. (1993). Information technology enabled business process redesign: an integrated framework, doi
  30. (1994). IT enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition’, Sloan Management Review,
  31. (1994). Japan’s white colar blues’, Fortune,
  32. (1989). Management Strategies for information Technology, Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead,
  33. (1993). Managing change: the art of balancing’,
  34. (1994). Managing in the marketspace’,
  35. (1993). Memo to a CEO: Avoiding the mainframe trap in redesign’, The McKinsey Quarterly, Autumn,
  36. (1980). MIS research: reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition’,
  37. (1994). New treatments or old remedies: is business process reengineering really socio-technical design’, doi
  38. (1990). op. cit. A more rigorous discussion of the intellectual inheritance of BPR can be found in
  39. (1990). op. cit.;
  40. (1968). Principles of Systems,
  41. (1993). Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology, doi
  42. (1994). Putting IT in its place: a polemic for the nineties’,
  43. (1995). Re-engineering Management: The Mandate for New Leadership, HarperCollins,
  44. (1994). Re-engineering redux: an agenda for next-generation BPR’, paper presented at the Ilth Annual Strategic Management Society Conference,
  45. (1994). Re-engineering: business change of mythic proportions?‘, doi
  46. (1994). Reengineering and organisational change: lessons from a comparative analysis of case studies’, Working Paper,
  47. (1994). Reengineering history: social resonance and business process reengineering’, doi
  48. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, Nicholas Brealey Publishing, doi
  49. (1994). Reengineering the role of IS professionals’,
  50. (1995). Reengineering utopia’,
  51. (1990). Reengineering work: don’t automate - obliterate’,
  52. (1994). Reengineering: the human costs and benefits’, doi
  53. (1995). Rethinking business process reengineering: a social constructionist perspective’,
  54. (1994). Serendipity and corporate transformation: business process re-engineering in North American and European financial institutions, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Strategic Management Society,
  55. (1994). Strategy as a field of study: why search for a new paradigm?’ doi
  56. (1993). Strategy as stretch and leverage’, Harvard Business Review,
  57. (1991). Summary of the project can be found
  58. (1990). Sustaining competitive advantage from IT’,
  59. (1993). Systems thinking and business process redesign’, doi
  60. (1981). The Art of Japanese Management, doi
  61. (1993). The horizontal organisation’,
  62. (1992). The horizontal organisation’, McKinsey Quarterly,
  63. (1988). The house of quality’,
  64. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books,
  65. (1992). The new boundaries of the “boundaryless” company’, Harvard Business Review, doi
  66. (1990). The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign’, Sloan Management Review,
  67. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, Prentice-Hall International, Hemel Hempstead,
  68. (1966). The Social Psychology of Organisations, doi
  69. (1994). The State ofRe-engineering,
  70. (1989). The Toyota Production System, doi
  71. (1994). This example is outlined by Cliff Bowman. For further elaboration, see C. Bowman ‘Stuck in old routines’,
  72. (1988). Time - the next source of competitive advantage’, doi
  73. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition. A New Foundation for Design, doi
  74. (1995). Will the turkeys vote for Christmas? The reengineering of human resources’,
  75. (1994). Work-flow and legacy systems’,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.