Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The 1988 Local Government Act and compulsory competitive tendering

By David Parker


School of Managemen

Year: 1990
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles


  1. (1976). A Statistical Estimation of an Operating Cost Function for Municipal Refuse Collection’,
  2. (1977). An Assessment of X-efficiency Gained Through Competition’, doi
  3. (1974). An Empirical Comparison of Government and Private Production Efficiency’,
  4. (1977). An Empirical Study of Competition doi
  5. (1986). Bureaucracy and Power without Responsibility’, doi
  6. (1985). Competftfon fn the Provfsfon of Local Authorfty Servfces, Department of The Environment,
  7. (1987). Competftfveness and Contracting out of Local Authorf tfes’ Servfces, Occasional Papers no. 3, Audit Commission,
  8. (1986). Competitive Tendering and Efficiency: The Case of Refuse Collection’, doi
  9. (1987). Competitive Tendering and Refuse Collection: Identifying the Sources of Efficiency Gains’, doi
  10. (1987). Competitive Tendering in the NHS: an economic analysis of the early implementation of HC(83)18’, Public Admlnfstratfon, ~01.65, Summer, doi
  11. (1988). Contractfng-out: Achievements and Problems, mimeo,
  12. (1989). Contracting Services I to the Private Sector:
  13. (1985). Contracting-out in Health and Local Authorities: prospects, progress and pitfalls’, doi
  14. (1984). Contractors’ Failures, Trade
  15. (1965). Cost Functions of the Urban Government Service: refuse collection’, doi
  16. (1984). Delivering Munfcfpal Services Efficiently: A Comparison of Municipal and Private Service Dellvery, Department of Housing and Urban Development,
  17. (1977). Economic Models of Bureaucracy: survey, extensions and evidence’ ,
  18. (1973). Efficiency in the Provision of Fire Services’, doi
  19. (1984). Express Coaching since 1980: Liberalisation in Practice’, doi
  20. (1988). Government as it Is, Hobart Paper 109, Institute of Economic Affairs,
  21. (1984). Improvfng Vehicle Fleet Management fn Local Government,
  22. (1985). Is the Private Sector more Efficient? A Study
  23. (1986). More Contractors’ Faflures, Trade
  24. (1988). Organizational Status and Performance: a conceptual framework for testing public choice theories’, doi
  25. (1989). Preparing for Compusory Competf tfon,
  26. (1982). Prfvatfsatfon of Local Government Actf vi ties: Lessons from Japan, Aims of Inustry,
  27. (1987). Prfvatizatfon: the Key to Better Government,
  28. (1984). Privatisation: The Wandsworth Experience’, Accountancy,
  29. (1989). Productivity in Local Government’,
  30. (1983). Public and Private Enterprise: Comparative Behaviour and Relative Efficiency’,
  31. (1989). Public Control of Natural Monopoly in the UK: Is Regulation the Answer’,
  32. (1977). Public versus Private Production Efficiency in Switzerland: a theoretical and empirical comparison’,
  33. (1979). Public versus Private Provision of Collective Goods and Services: garbage collection revisited’, doi
  34. (1976). Reprivatisierung des offentlichen Personalverkehers’, Der Personenverkehr,
  35. (1972). Scale and Monopoly Problems in Urban Government Services’, Urban Affafrs Quarterly, doi
  36. (1983). Spinning off” in Japan: the upsurge in Privatization’ ,
  37. (1985). The Canadian Experience with Privatizing Residential Solid Waste Collection Services’, doi
  38. (1984). The Construction Industry: Issues and Strategies in Developing Countrfes,
  39. (1988). The Employment Implications of Government Policy: A Case doi
  40. (1987). The Polftfcs of Prfvatfsatfon: Contractfng out Public Services,
  41. (1978). The Provision of Municipal Sanitation Services by Private Firms: an empirical analysis of the efficiency of alternative market structures and regulatory arrangements’, doi
  42. (1979). Transaction Cost Economics: the Governance of Contractual Relations‘, doi
  43. (1984). Why Contract Out’, in Contracting out fn the Public Sector,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.