Location of Repository

Do Mayoral Elections Work? Evidence From London

By John Curtice, Ben Seyd and Katarina Thomson


The introduction of directly elected mayors potentially represents a major reform of the operation of local government in Britain. Drawing upon survey data collected at the time of the first two London mayoral elections, this article considers whether such elections necessarily deliver the advantages claimed for them by their advocates. It addresses three questions: (i) What was the basis of public support for the new institutions, (ii) Who participated in the London elections, and why; and (iii) What accounts for voting behaviour in the London elections? In particular we examine how far the election of a single person executive helps provide people with a clear choice, encourages citizens to vote on the qualities of individual candidates rather than on their party affiliation, and motivates people to vote on distinctively local issues as opposed to national ones. Our results suggest that while mayoral elections deliver some of the advantages claimed for them, they may be less successful on others. The extent to which directly elected mayors enhance the local electoral process is thus doubtful

Topics: JN101, JS
Publisher: Blackwell
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:kar.kent.ac.uk:23805

Suggested articles



  1. (1999). Between First and Second Order: A Comparison of Voting Behaviour in European and Local Elections in Britain’,
  2. (2002). Bromley and Curtice
  3. (2000). Citizen Opinion and Constitutional Choices: The Case of the UK’,
  4. (2004). Citizenship in Britain:Values, Participation and Democracy. Cambridge:
  5. (1995). Commission for Local Democracy
  6. Communities and Local Government (2006) Strong and Prosperous Communities: The Local Government White Paper. Cm 6939. London: The Stationery Office.
  7. (2003). Devolution Meets the Voters: The Prospects for 2003’,
  8. (2004). Directly Elected Mayors:ATonic for Local Governance or OldWine in
  9. (2007). Elsie Article No: 705 Delivery date: 30
  10. (2002). Governing London.
  11. (2006). Greater LondonAssembly Election Study 2004, End of Award Report to ESRC.Grant number RES-219-25-2005.Available from: http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk [Accessed 14
  12. (1999). Heath and Taylor
  13. (1988). Irrelevant Elections? The Quality of Local Democracy in Britain.
  14. (2001). Is Devolution Succouring
  15. (1999). Is Scotland a Nation andWales Not?’, in B. Taylor and K. Thomson (eds), Scotland andWales: Nations Again? Cardiff:
  16. (1998). Is There Really a Demand for Constitutional Change?,
  17. (1998). Leading theWay:A NewVision for Local Government. London:Research Institute for Public Policy.
  18. (1997). Local Elections in Britain.
  19. (2001). London Mayoral Election Survey 2000: Technical Report. London: National Centre for Social Research.
  20. (2004). Mid-Term:Lessons from the First Eighteen Months of Directly Elected Mayors. London:New Local Government Network.
  21. (1997). More Than the Flower Show: Elected Mayors and Democracy.
  22. (1999). New Sources of Abstention?’,
  23. (1980). Nine National Second-Order Elections’,
  24. (1989). Official and Reported Turnout in the British General Election of 1997’,
  25. (2000). Personality Politics and ProtestVoting: The First Elections to the Greater London Authority’,
  26. (2004). Please supply the issue number.
  27. (2005). Please supply the page range.
  28. (2003). Public Opinion and the
  29. (2005). Public Opinion and the Future of Devolution’,
  30. (2001). Race and Representation: Electoral Politics and Ethnic Pluralism in Britain. Manchester:
  31. (1999). The 1997Welsh ReferendumVote’, in B. Taylor and K. Thomson (eds), Scotland andWales: Nations Again? Cardiff:
  32. (2007). The Authors. Journal compilation ©
  33. (1998). the Environment, Transport and the Regions
  34. (2004). The Politics of London: Governing an Ungovernable City. Houndmills,
  35. (1996). The Reform of the Institutions of Local Representative Democracy: IsThere a Role for the Mayor-Council Model? London: Commission for Local Democracy.
  36. (1999). The Scottish Electorate: The
  37. (2004). Transforming Local Governance: From Thatcherism to New Labour.
  38. (2004). Turnout, Participation and Legitimacy in Post-devolution Wales’,
  39. (2004). Understanding Local Political Leadership: Constitutions, Contexts and Capabilities’, Local Government Studies,
  40. (2004). Urban Elites in England: New Models of Executive Governance’,
  41. (2002). Where Have All theVoters Gone?’,
  42. (1999). Wyn Jones and Trystan

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.