Location of Repository

A Reciprocal Relationship Between Bottom-up Trace Strength and the Attentional Blink Bottleneck: Relating the LC-NE and ST2 Models

By Howard Bowman, Brad Wyble, Srivas Chennu and Patrick Craston

Abstract

There is considerable current interest in neural modelling of the attentional blink phenomenon. Two prominent models of this task are the Simultaneous Type Serial Token (ST2) model and the Locus Coeruleus Norepinephrine (LC-NE) model. The former of these generates a broad spectrum of behavioural data, while the latter provides a neurophysiologically detailed account. This paper explores the relationship between these two approaches. Specifically, we consider the spectrum of empirical phenomena that the two models generate, particularly emphasizing the need to generate a reciprocal relationship between bottom-up trace strength and the blink bottleneck. Then we discuss the implications of using ST2 token mechanisms in the LC-NE setting

Topics: QA76
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:kar.kent.ac.uk:23957

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2008). 25– 42Chun,
  2. (2004). A Connectionist Model of the Attentional Blink Effect During a Rapid Serial Visual Task.
  3. (2005). A neurodynamic model of the attentional blink. doi
  4. (2003). A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. doi
  5. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. doi
  6. (2005). Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness.
  7. (2004). An extended buffer model for active maintenance and selective doi
  8. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus–norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. doi
  9. (1999). Attentional switching spatial and non spatial domains: evidence from the attentional blink. doi
  10. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution. doi
  11. (2005). Computational and experimental evaluation of the attentional blink: testing the Simultaneous 41
  12. (2000). Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain. doi
  13. (2003). Connectionist Modelling of Attentionand Anxiety. Unpublished PhD, The Medical Research Council’s Cognition and Brain Sciences unit,
  14. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. doi
  15. (2005). Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus–norepinephrine system. doi
  16. (2002). Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink. doi
  17. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. doi
  18. (2003). Event-related potential correlates of the attentional blink phenomenon. doi
  19. (1983). Iconic memory. doi
  20. (2001). Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: a computational model. doi
  21. (2001). Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events.
  22. (2000). Locus coeruleus and regulation of behavioral flexibility and attention. doi
  23. (1997). Low-level masking in the attentional blink. doi
  24. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. doi
  25. (1998). Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: evidence from speeded and unspeeded task1 decisions. doi
  26. (2001). Nature of codes extracted during the attentional blink. doi
  27. (2000). Neural correlates of the attentional blink. doi
  28. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. doi
  29. (2000). On the control of control: the role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working
  30. (2005). Out of sight but not out of mind: the neurophysiology of iconic memory in the superior temporal sulcus. doi
  31. (2006). P3 latency shifts in the attentional blink: further evidence for second target processing postponement. Brain Res. doi
  32. (1997). Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual “cocktail party” effect. doi
  33. (1997). Priming from the attentional blink: a failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. doi
  34. (2006). Quick minds don’t blink: electrophysiological correlates of individual differences in attentional selection. doi
  35. (1991). Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. doi
  36. (1987). Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation. doi
  37. (2002). Simplified dynamics in a model of noradrenergic modulation of cognitive performance. doi
  38. (2005). Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink. doi
  39. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Res. doi
  40. (1997). Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink. doi
  41. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? doi
  42. (2001). The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits. doi
  43. (2005). The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control? doi
  44. (1988). The human locus coeruleus: computer reconstruction of cellular distribution.
  45. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. doi
  46. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. doi
  47. (1999). The role of locus coeruleus in the regulation of cognitive performance. doi
  48. (2005). The role of the locus coeruleus in mediating the attentional blink: a neurocomputational theory.
  49. (1999). The roles of location specificity and masking mechanisms in the attentional blink. doi
  50. (2007). The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory. doi
  51. (2002). The time course for competition for attention: attention is initially labile. doi
  52. (2007). The time course of attention: it is better than we thought. doi
  53. (1997). Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. doi
  54. (1993). Very short-term conceptual memory. doi
  55. (2002). Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. doi
  56. (2000). What’s new in visual masking? doi
  57. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.