Location of Repository

Check Fraud and the Variation of Section 4-401: Why Banks Should Not Be Able to Vary the UCC\u27s Standard Risk Allocation Scheme

By Michael Coutu

Abstract

Uniform Commercial Code Article 4 governs both a bank’s duties in collecting checks for payment as well as its duties to its depositors. Section 4-401 provides that a bank can charge an item to a customer’s account only if it is properly payable. For an item to be properly payable, it must be authorized by the customer. This Note examines the 2010 case, Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Wachovia Bank, in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota stated that a bank can vary section 4-401’s default rule by including negotiated provisions in the deposit agreement. After exploring the structure and history of Article 4, this Note argues that banks should not be able to vary section 4-401’s default rule, and proposes that courts take into account the history of Article 4 when analyzing which default rules banks can vary through deposit provisions

Topics: Uniform Commercial Code, banking, Banking and Finance Law, Commercial Law
Publisher: Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School
Year: 2013
OAI identifier: oai:lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu:bclr-3275
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.ed... (external link)
  • http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.ed... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.