In the realm of government, the goal of publicity translates into \u22openness,\u22 and its proponents have long cited James Madison: \u22A popular government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy, or perhaps both.\u22 In recent times, openness in government--and the quest for it--have experienced a resounding revival of interest. The result is yet another of those intriguing domains where basic traditional sentiments merge with intense modern reforms. Governments at all levels have felt the impact of that revival, an impact produced by diverse developments in various contexts. Three such developments most prominent on the surface are \u22open meetings,\u22 \u22disclosure,\u22 and \u22open records.\u22 These developments have extended, to at least an interesting degree, to Georgia local governments. That none of the developments has yet run its course does not detract from the importance of what has occurred nor its significance as a benchmark for the measurement of future movement
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.