Location of Repository

Privacy and Dignity in Continence Care for Older People.\ud Report on Phase 1.

By Jenny R. Billings and Helen P. Alaszewski


In recent years dignity in care has become a priority and the focus of a number of government reports and policy initiatives. (DH 2003, 2007), (SCIE 2006). The National Service Framework for older people (DH 2001) and its follow up document, (DH 2006a) for example stated that maintaining dignity was pivotal in improving care for older people. However, despite this political support, there continue to be problems in health and social care settings related to preserving the dignity of older people (Levenson 2007). There is a risk therefore that generalised policy statements have little effect on actual practice and care unless they are operational, and supported by detailed guidelines for practice.\ud \ud Alongside policy, there has also been an increase in studies of dignity in health care (Chochinov et al,2002a), (Woolhead et al 2006) particularly focusing on the ways in which dignity is defined and what it means to people. There have, however, been far fewer on the relationship between dignity and personal care particularly when care involves sensitive issues such as incontinence. This report provides an initial analysis of emerging themes and findings from Phase 1 of the study of privacy and dignity in continence care for older people funded by the Royal College of Physicians and the British Geriatrics Society.\ud The overall objectives of this two year project are to:\ud i. develop reflective standards/guidelines for dignified care, \ud ii. produce recommendations for best practice,\ud iii. provide advice with regard to changing practice in the clinical setting.\u

Topics: RA0421, RC952, RZ
Publisher: Centre for Health Services Studies
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:kar.kent.ac.uk:24790

Suggested articles



  1. (2002b) ‘Dignity in the terminally ill: a developing empirical model’, doi
  2. (2004). A concept analysis of dignity for older people’, doi
  3. (2005). An analysis of the concept dignity’, doi
  4. (2003). British geriatrics Society
  5. (2007). Care of older people: Maintaining the dignity and autonomy of older people in the healthcare setting’, doi
  6. (2007). Caring for Dignity: A national report on dignity in care for older people while in hospital,
  7. (1994). Concept clarification in professional practice – dignity’, doi
  8. (2001). Continence, health policy and older people’, doi
  9. (2007). Deference as a Form of Reciprocity Among Residents in Assisted Living’, doi
  10. (2007). Dignity and health: a review’, doi
  11. (2006). Dignity in Care: Adult services practice guide 9, SCIE,
  12. (2004). Dignity in older age: what do older people in the United Kingdom think?’, doi
  13. (2003). Essence of Care: Patient-focused benchmarks for clinical governance, London: NHS Modernisation Agency.
  14. (1999). Factors affecting the quality of nursing care: The patient’s perspective’, doi
  15. (1999). Factors relating to nurse communication with elderly people’, doi
  16. (2000). Good practice in continence services, London: The Stationery Office.
  17. (1991). Interpersonal communication between nurses and elderly patients: refinement of an observation schedule’, doi
  18. (2006). Involving Older Continence Service Users in the Development of Standards of Care: A Pilot Study.
  19. (2004). Medical and self-care practices reported by women with urinary incontinence’, doi
  20. (2004). National Standards, local action. Health and social care standards and planning framework, London: The Stationery Office.
  21. (2006). Patients' dignity in a rehabilitation ward: ethical challenges for nursing staff’, doi
  22. (2004). Perceptual adjustment levels: patient’s perception of their dignity in the hospital setting’, doi
  23. (2007). Privacy and Dignity – A report by the Chief Nursing Officer into mixed sex accommodation in hospitals,
  24. (2006). Promoting privacy and dignity for older patients in hospital’, doi
  25. (1998). Research instrumentation and elderly subjects’, doi
  26. (2006). Royal College of Physicians. doi
  27. (1995). Stigmatising a “normal” condition: urinary incontinence in late life’, doi
  28. (1987). Strategies of Social Research: the methodological imagination.
  29. (2008). Supporting older people in care homes at night,
  30. (2007). The Challenge of Dignity in Care: Upholding the rights of the individual, London: Help the Aged.
  31. (2001). The National Service framework for older people, London: The Stationery Office.
  32. (1972). The Unpopular Patient, doi
  33. (2006). Tu” or “Vous”?: A European qualitative study of dignity and communication with older people in health and social care settings’, Patient Education and Counseling, doi
  34. (2006). Views on dignity of elderly nursing home residents’, doi
  35. (2004). What prevents older people from seeking treatment for urinary incontinence? A qualitative exploration of barriers to the use of community continence services’, Family Practice, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.