Location of Repository

Immigration Restriction as Redistributive Taxation: Working Women and the Costs of Protectionism in the Labor Market

By Howard F. Chang

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that tax and transfer policies are more efficient than immigration restrictions as instruments for raising the after-tax incomes of the least skilled native workers. Policies to protect these native workers from immigrant competition in the labor market do no better at promoting distributive justice and are likely to impose a greater economic burden on natives in the country of immigration than the tax alternative. These immigration restrictions are especially costly given the disproportionate burden that they place on households with working women, which discourages female participation in the labor force. This burden runs contrary to the teachings of optimal tax theory and introduces excessive distortions in the labor market because the supply of female labor is more elastic than the supply of male labor. Thus, the best response to concerns about the effect of immigration on the distribution of income among natives is to increase the progressivity of the tax system

Topics: Immigration Law, Labor Economics, Feminism, Women, Gender Studies, Income Taxation, Law and Equality, Race Relations, Economics, International Trade, Law and Economics, Law and Society, Taxation, Immigration Law, Law and Economics, Law and Gender, Law and Society, Taxation
Publisher: NELLCO Legal Scholarship Repository
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:lsr.nellco.org:upenn_wps-1228
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://lsr.nellco.org/upenn_wp... (external link)
  • http://scholarship.law.upenn.e... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.