Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Estimating Business and Management Journal Quality from the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise in the UK

By John Mingers, Kate Watson and Maria Paola Scaparra
Topics: H1
Publisher: University of Kent Canterbury
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:kar.kent.ac.uk:25448

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). A comparison of journal submissions to the UK's Research Assessment Exercises doi
  2. (2007). Challenges to information systems: time to change', doi
  3. (2005). Guidance on submissions'. doi
  4. (2008). Measuring research quality: The united Kingdom Government's Research Assessment Exercise', doi
  5. (2008). RAE doi
  6. (2008). RAE 2008: the outcome'. HEFCE, doi
  7. RAE2008 subject overview reports:
  8. (2007). Ranking journals in business and management: a statistical analysis of the Harzing dataset', doi
  9. (2004). research assessment exercise in the UK', doi
  10. Research Excellence Framework: Second consultation on the assessment and funding of research'.
  11. (2007). Reviewing journal rankings and revisiting peer reviews: Editorial perspectives', doi
  12. (2007). Ring a ring o'roses: quality journals and gamesmanship in Management Studies', doi
  13. (2008). submissions: doi
  14. (2003). The state of the field in UK management research: Reflections of the Research Assessment (RAE) Panel', doi
  15. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings', doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.