Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Perfectionism, efficiency, and response bias in proof-reading performance: Extension and replication

By Joachim Stoeber


In an investigation of perfectionism and proof-reading performance differentiating between perfectionist strivings and perfectionist concerns, Stoeber and Eysenck (2008) found that only perfectionist strivings (but not perfectionist concerns) showed significant correlations with proof-reading performance: a negative correlation with efficiency (accuracy divided by time invested in the task) and a positive correlation with false alarms (incorrectly detected errors). The aim of the present study was to expand on Stoeber and Eysenck’s study investigating 156 students using different measures of perfectionism and a different text for proof-reading. Results replicated Stoeber and Eysenck’s main findings: Perfectionist strivings showed a negative correlation with efficiency and a positive correlation with false alarms. In addition, they showed a positive correlation with invested time and a negative correlation with response bias against reporting errors. In contrast, perfectionist concerns did not show any significant correlations with proof-reading performance. The findings corroborate the association between perfectionist strivings and reduced efficiency. Moreover, they further confirm the importance of (a) differentiating perfectionist strivings and perfectionist concerns, (b) using signal detection analysis, and (c) considering both absolute performance and relative performance (efficiency) when investigating the relationships of perfectionism with performance

Topics: BF
Year: 2011
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2007). An efficient method for classifying perfectionists. doi
  2. (2005). College students’ perfectionism and task-strategy inefficience: Why their efforts go unrewarded?
  3. (1993). Heat, hostility, and immune function: The moderating effects of gender and demand characteristics. doi
  4. (2009). Perfectionism and achievement goals in young Finnish ice-hockey players aspiring to make the Under-16 national team. doi
  5. (2007). Perfectionism and aptitude test performance: Testees who strive for perfection achieve better results. doi
  6. (2008). Perfectionism and efficiency: Accuracy, response bias, and invested time in proof-reading performance. doi
  7. (2003). Perfectionism and ethnicity: Implications for depressive symptoms and self-reported academic achievement. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, doi
  8. (2002). Perfectionism and maladjustment: An overview of theoretical, definitional, and treatment issues. In doi
  9. (2010). Perfectionism and task performance: Time on task mediates the perfectionistic strivings–performance relationship. doi
  10. (2007). Perfectionism in adolescent school students: Relations with motivation, achievement, and well-being. doi
  11. (2007). Perfectionism in young musicians: Relations with motivation, effort, achievement, and distress. doi
  12. (2010). Perfectionistic concerns suppress associations between perfectionistic strivings and positive life outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, doi
  13. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. doi
  14. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.
  15. (1985). Speed-accuracy trade-off and time of day. doi
  16. (1990). Taste/taste potentiation as a function of age and stimulus intensity. doi
  17. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. doi
  18. (2001). The revised Almost Perfect Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.