Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Perfectionism and coping with daily failures: Positive reframing helps achieve satisfaction at the end of the day\ud

By Joachim Stoeber and Dirk P. Janssen


Differentiating perfectionistic strivings and perfectionistic concerns, the present study examined how perfectionism predicts what coping strategies people use when dealing with failures, and how perfectionism and coping influence people’s satisfaction. A sample of 149 students completed daily reports for 3 to 14 days reporting the most bothersome failure they experienced during the day, what strategies they used to cope with the failure, and how satisfied they felt at the end of the day. Multilevel regression analyses showed that perfectionistic concerns predicted more frequent use of self-blame, less frequent use of active coping and acceptance, and higher satisfaction at the end of the day whereas perfectionistic strivings predicted less frequent use of self-blame and higher satisfaction. Whereas positive reframing, acceptance, and humor predicted higher satisfaction for all students, further analyses showed that positive reframing coping was particularly helpful for students high in perfectionistic concern. The findings suggest that accommodative coping strategies are generally helpful in dealing with personal failures, with positive reframing being a coping strategy that works particularly well for people high in perfectionistic concerns (who are prone to dissatisfaction) to achieve higher satisfaction at the end of the day

Topics: BF
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2011
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). A first study of perfectionism and multidimensional life satisfaction among adolescents. doi
  2. (2009). A mobile phone program to track young people’s experiences of mood, stress and coping. doi
  3. (2001). Adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism in medical students: A longitudinal investigation. doi
  4. (2008). Athletes’ broad dimensions of dispositional perfectionism: Examining changes in life satisfaction and the mediating role of sport-related motivation and coping.
  5. (2007). Correlates with perfectionism and the utility of a dual process model. Personality and Individual Differences, doi
  6. (1999). Does trait coping exist? A momentary assessment approach to the evaluation of traits. doi
  7. (2010). Perfectionism and athlete burnout in junior elite athletes: The mediating influence of coping tendencies. doi
  8. (2010). Perfectionism and Coping with Daily Failures doi
  9. (2010). Perfectionism and Coping with Daily Failures 32 Footnotes 1With a Mardia’s coefficient of 2.15, the data showed only minor deviations from multivariate normality. Moreover, when we estimated model fit using bootstrapping (see Byrne,
  10. (2001). Perfectionism, coping, and emotional adjustment.
  11. (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. doi
  12. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review, doi
  13. (2006). Secondary control reviewed and defined. doi
  14. (2004). Self-criticism, dependency, selfesteem, and grade point average satisfaction among clusters of perfectionists and nonperfectionists. doi
  15. (1992). Social support and stress: The role of social comparison and social exchange processes. doi
  16. (1980). The perfectionist’s script for self-defeat.
  17. (1998). When perfect isn’t good enough: Strategies for coping with perfectionism.
  18. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the Brief COPE. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.