Article thumbnail

Still Particular: A Reply to Ganson and Mehta

By Anil Gomes and Craig French

Abstract

We are grateful to Ganson and Mehta (forthcoming) for their reply to our defence of phenomenal particularism against the objections raised by Mehta in his (2014). Their reply clarifies the nature of their objections to phenomenal particularism and helps identify the locus of our disagreements. In what follows we aim to defend phenomenal particularism against the objections raised in their reply

Topics: Philosophy
OAI identifier: oai:philpapers.org/rec/GOMSPA
Provided by: PhilPapers

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.