Article thumbnail

Why Justification Matters

By Declan Smithies

Abstract

This chapter is guided by the hypothesis that the point and purpose of using the concept of justification in epistemic evaluation is tied to its role in the practice of critical reflection. In section one, I propose an analysis of justification as the epistemic property in virtue of which a belief has the potential to survive ideal critical reflection. In section two, I use this analysis in arguing for a form of access internalism on which one has justification to believe a proposition if and only if one has higher-order justification to believe that one has justification to believe that proposition. In section three, I distinguish between propositional and doxastic versions of access internalism and argue that the propositional version avoids familiar objections to the doxastic version. In section four, I argue that the propositional version of access internalism also explains and vindicates internalist intuitions about cases. In section five, I conclude with some reflections on the relationship between critical reflection, responsibility and personhood

Topics: Philosophy
Year: 2015
DOI identifier: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199642632.003.0010
OAI identifier: oai:philpapers.org/rec/SMIWJM
Provided by: PhilPapers

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.