Article thumbnail

Factors that influence the radiofrequency power output of GSM mobile phones.

By Linda S Erdreich, Maria D Van Kerkhove, Carolyn G Scrafford, Leila Barraj, Mark McNeely, Mona Shum, Asher R Sheppard and Michael Kelsh

Abstract

Epidemiological studies of mobile phone use and risk of brain cancer have relied on self-reported use, years as a subscriber, and billing records as exposure surrogates without addressing the level of radiofrequency (RF) power output. The objective of this study was to measure environmental, behavioral and engineering factors affecting the RF power output of GSM mobile phones during operation. We estimated the RF-field exposure of volunteer subjects who made mobile phone calls using software-modified phones (SMPs) that recorded output power settings. Subjects recruited from three geographic areas in the U.S. were instructed to log information (place, time, etc.) for each call made and received during a 5-day period. The largest factor affecting energy output was study area, followed by user movement and location (inside or outside), use of a hands-free device, and urbanicity, although the two latter factors accounted for trivial parts of overall variance. Although some highly statistically significant differences were identified, the effects on average energy output rate were usually less than 50% and were generally comparable to the standard deviation. These results provide information applicable to improving the precision of exposure metrics for epidemiological studies of GSM mobile phones and may have broader application for other mobile phone systems and geographic locations

Publisher: 'Radiation Research Society'
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1667/RR0906.1
OAI identifier: oai:researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk:9048
Provided by: LSHTM Research Online
Sorry, our data provider has not provided any external links therefore we are unable to provide a link to the full text.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). Annual Drinking Water Quality Report for 2003. Lockport, NY:Niagara County Water District.
  2. (1999). Arsenic compounds in terrestrial biota. In:
  3. (1997). Bingham Creek Environmental Health Lead and Arsenic Exposure Study. Final Report. Cincinnati, OH:University of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health.
  4. (2002). Child-Specific Exposure Factors Handbook. Interim Report.
  5. (1999). Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic. In:
  6. (1997). Environmental arsenic exposure of children around a former copper smelter site. Environ Res 72:72–81.
  7. (2002). Environmental Protection Agency,
  8. (2004). Estimation of dietary intake of inorganic arsenic
  9. (2002). Estimation of multimedia inorganic arsenic intake in the U.S. population. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8(7):1697–1721.
  10. (1985). Evolution of efficient methods to sample lead sources, such as house dust or hand dust, in the homes of children.
  11. (1999). Exposure to arsenosugars from seafood ingestion and speciation of urinary arsenic metabolites. In:
  12. (2004). Exposure to inorganic arsenic in soil increases urinary inorganic arsenic concentrations of residents living in older mining areas. Environ Geochem Health 26:27–36.
  13. (2003). Hair analysis: exploring the state of the science. Environ Health Perspect 111:576–578.
  14. (2003). Hair and toenail arsenic concentrations of residents living in areas with high environmental arsenic concentrations. Environ Health Perspect 111:187–193.
  15. (1999). Hair arsenic as an index of toxicity. In:
  16. (2000). Measurement of low levels of arsenic exposure: a comparison of water and toenail concentrations.
  17. (1996). Method 1632. Inorganic Arsenic in Water by Hydride Generation Quartz Furnace Atomic Absorption. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Engineering and Analysis Division.
  18. (1996). Method 1638. Determination of Trace Elements in Ambient Waters by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Engineering and Analysis Division.
  19. (1990). Pathways of human exposure to arsenic in a community surrounding a copper smelter. Environ Res 53:29–47.
  20. (2003). Risk factors for increased urinary inorganic arsenic concentrations from low arsenic concentrations in drinking water.
  21. (1987). Ruston/Vashon Arsenic Exposure Pathways Study. Seattle, WA:University of Washington,
  22. (2000). Table DP-1: Profile of General Demographic Characteristics:
  23. (1986). Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods (SW846). Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
  24. (2000). Toxicological Profile for Arsenic (Update)
  25. (1997). Urinary arsenic excretion as a biomarker of arsenic exposure in children.
  26. (1988). Urinary Arsenic Survey,
  27. (2005). Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements. Environ Health Perspect 113:192–200.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.