Article thumbnail

C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in the evaluation of the efficacy of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Gambian children.

By Yin-Bun Cheung, Syed MA Zaman, Marja-Leena Ruopuro, Godwin Enwere, Richard A Adegbola, Brian Greenwood and Felicity T Cutts

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin in the evaluation of the efficacy of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Gambian children. METHODS: The investigation was done as a substudy of a phase III pneumococcal conjugate vaccine trial. A pilot study (n = 120) to compare CRP and procalcitonin concentrations in children with pneumonia was undertaken, followed by a larger study of CRP concentrations (n = 1868) obtained from a subsample of children with clinical pneumonia seen during the trial. RESULTS: In the pilot study, CRP had a higher sensitivity and specificity for the detection of primary endpoint (radiographic) pneumonia than procalcitonin. In the subsequent study of 1868 episodes of clinical pneumonia, CRP showed moderate sensitivity but poor positive predictive value in identifying primary endpoint pneumonia or pneumococcal bacteraemia. Addition of CRP thresholds of 40, 60 or 120 mg/l to the diagnosis of clinical pneumonia did not give higher estimates of vaccine efficacy or vaccine attributable reduction in incidence than primary endpoint pneumonia. CONCLUSION: A combination of a raised CRP concentration with a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia is a more specific endpoint than clinical pneumonia alone but less appropriate than primary endpoint pneumonia as a measure of the impact of a pneumococcal vaccine in a Gambian setting

Publisher: 'Wiley'
Year: 2008
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02050.x
OAI identifier: oai:researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk:8118
Provided by: LSHTM Research Online
Sorry, our data provider has not provided any external links therefore we are unable to provide a link to the full text.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). A confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire among older people.
  2. (2004). A confirmatory factor analysis of the General Health Questionnaire-12. Stress and Health
  3. (1988). A User's Guide to the General Health Questionnaire.
  4. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties.
  5. (1999). Assessing the multidimensionality of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Rep
  6. (2004). CJ: Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000. Br J Psychiatry
  7. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the GHQ-12: can I see that again?
  8. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling
  9. (1990). DP: A comparison of the validity of GHQ-12 and CHQ-12 in Chinese primary care patients in Manchester. Psychol Med
  10. (2000). Fong KY: Validation of the Chinese SF-36 for quality of life assessment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus
  11. (1994). For better or worse? Annual change in smoking, selfassessed health and subjective well-being.
  12. (1993). Gandek B: SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide.
  13. (1977). Gribbin CC: A factor analytic study of the twelveitem General Health Questionnaire.
  14. (1996). KT: An evaluation of incremental fit indices: a clarification of mathematical and empirical properties.
  15. (2001). ML: A community based study of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the English (UK) and Chinese (HK) SF-36 in Singapore. Qual Life Res
  16. (1998). MS: Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.
  17. (1991). Multidimensional properties of the General Health Questionnaire. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol
  18. (1994). Reliability, validity and factor structure of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire among young males in Italy. Acta Psychiatr Scand
  19. (2004). SC: Factors influencing healthrelated quality of life of Asians with anxiety disorders in Singapore. Qual Life Res
  20. (1994). Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care
  21. (2004). Social position and minor psychiatric morbidity over time in the British Household Panel Survey 1991–1998. J Epidemiol Community Health
  22. (2004). Tait RJ: Measurement invariance in the General Health Questionnaire-12 in young Australian adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry
  23. (1985). The Chinese version of the General Health Questionnaire: does language make a difference? Psychol Med
  24. (1989). The General Health Questionnaire: a psychometric analysis using latent trait theory. Psychol Med
  25. (1983). TS: Reliability, validity and the structure of the General Health Questionnaire in a Chinese context. Psychol Med
  26. (2000). Ustun BT: The stability of the factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire. Psy Med
  27. (2003). Wyrwich KW: Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care
  28. (1999). Z: In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's