Location of Repository

Ethics in Alternative Dispute Resolution: New Issues, No Answers from the Adversary Conception of Lawyers’ Responsibilities

By Carrie Menkel-Meadow


The romantic days of ADR appear to be over. To the extent that proponents of ADR, like myself, were attracted to it because of its promise of flexibility, adaptability, and creativity, we now see the need for ethics, standards of practice and rules as potentially limiting and containing the promise of alternatives to rigid adversarial modes of dispute resolution. It is almost as if we thought that anyone who would engage in ADR must of necessity be a moral, good, creative, and, of course, ethical person. That we are here today is deeply ironic and yet, also necessary, as \u22appropriate\u22 dispute resolution struggles to define itself and insure its legitimacy against a variety of theoretical and practical challenges

Topics: Dispute Resolution and Arbitration, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Publisher: Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW
Year: 1997
OAI identifier: oai:scholarship.law.georgetown.edu:facpub-2758
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://scholarship.law.georget... (external link)
  • http://scholarship.law.georget... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.