Most federal appellate judges are generalists, not intensively schooled in economic theory and mindful of the limits to their institutional competence. Judicial review of economic analyses is an increasingly important task of the courts, however, particularly courts like the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that hear appeals from the rules and rulings of regulatory agencies. Agencies use economic analyses for administrative decision-making in a variety of ways. They may be required by statute to make decisions that are \u22economically feasible\u22 or to consider \u22reasonableness of cost.\u22 Even when the governing statute says nothing specific about economic principles, the agency may rely heavily on economic analysis to meet more general statutory criteria, such as determining that rates are \u22just and reasonable.\u22 In such cases, the agency often uses economic theory to predict the consequences of a particular action and to determine whether that action is in accord with the statutory mandate. In still other cases, the agency may use economic analysis simply to find jurisdictional facts
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.