Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

\u22In Time of Whenever the Secretary Says\u22: The Constitutional Case Against Court-Martial Jurisdiction over Accompanying Civilians During Contingency Operations

By Anna Manasco Dionne


This Note mounts a constitutional case against the recent amendment to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) providing court-martial jurisdiction over defense contractors and other civilians accompanying American armed forces during contingency operations. The amendment provides extraordinarily expansive military jurisdiction, and it exceeds the constitutional authority of Congress. This Note considers and rejects three potential authorities for the measure: the Fifth Amendment, the Rulemaking Power, and the War Powers. It finds grave objections arising from the plain text of the provisions, materials illuminating the historical understanding of these words, and the constitutional division of military authorities across the federal structure

Topics: Law
Publisher: Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository
Year: 2015
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.