Location of Repository

SPARKPLUS for Self- and Peer Assessment on Group-Based Honours’ Research Projects

By C. Wu, E. Chanda and J. Willison


This paper explores an application of an online tool SPARKPLUS (Self and Peer Assessment Resource Kit) for the self and peer assessment on the group-based Honours’ research projects. The Honours’ research projects in School of Civil, Environmental Engineering at University of Adelaide are running in a small group of students (typically four students or less) working with an academic supervisor in a selected area for one year. Since the research project is self-directed study, it is very difficult to fairly assess the contribution of individual students to the group-based research project. The paper-based method of self and peer assessment for the Honour’s research projects was used in the previous years. The same mark was often distributed and no feedback was given. Both the students and academic staff were not satisfied with the paper-based method of self and peer assessment. Thus an online tool SPARK PLUS together with a set of assessment criteria was used for the self and peer assessment of the Honours’ research projects in 2010. Thirty-seven groups participated in the self and peer assessment of using SPARK PLUS in semester one 2010 and a series of results from the online self and peer assessment were obtained and analysed. Feedback sessions were held and substantial feedback was received from students. Based on the feedback, suggestions were made on improving use of the online tool for self and peer assessment on the Honours’ research project.Chengqing Wu, Emmanuel Chanda and John Willisonhttp://www.adelaide.edu.au/erg

Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:digital.library.adelaide.edu.au:2440/61612

Suggested articles



  1. (2002). SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self- and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects. doi
  2. (2005). Engineering graduates’ perceptions of how well they were prepare for work in industry. doi
  3. (2006). Improving teamwork and engagement: the case for self and peer assessment.
  4. (2008). Using self-assessment to integrate graduate attribute development with discipline content delivery.
  5. (2009). Developing team skills with self-and peer assessment. doi
  6. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: A framework for students becoming researchers. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.