Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Infant vocabulary development assessed with a British communicative development inventory

By Antonia Hamilton, Kim Plunkett and Graham Schafer


Communicative Development Inventories (CDIs) were collected from 669 British children aged between 1;0 and 2;1. Comprehension and production scores in each age group are calculated. This provides norming data for the British infant population. The influence of socioeconomic group on vocabulary scores is considered and shown not to have a significant effect. The data from British infants is compared to data from American infants (Fenson, Dale, Reznick, Bates, Thal & Pethick, 1994). It is found that British infants have lower scores on both comprehension and production than American infants of the same age

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2000
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). Assessing communicative and linguistic development through parent and teacher report,
  2. (1990). Early lexical acquisition: rate, content, and the vocabulary spurt.
  3. (1988). From first words to grammar: individual differences and dissociable mechanisms.
  4. (1997). Language comprehension and cerebral specialization from 13 to 20 months.
  5. (1993). Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers : comparison to monolingual norms.
  6. (1894). Preliminary report on the learning of language.
  7. (1998). Rapid word learning by fifteen-month-olds under tightly controlled conditions. doi
  8. (1987). The eyes have it : lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm.
  9. (1995). The head-turn preference procedure for testing auditory perception.
  10. (1994). The instrument is great, but measuring comprehension is still a problem. doi
  11. (1989). The validity of a parent report instrument of child language at twenty months.
  12. (1999). When does an ostrich become a bird: the role of prototypes in early word comprehension,
  13. (1982). Word frequencies in British and American English, The Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.