Location of Repository

Performance and prediction: Bayesian modelling of\ud fallible choice in chess

By Guy McCrossan Haworth, Ken Regan and Giuseppe Di Fatta

Abstract

Evaluating agents in decision-making applications requires assessing their skill and predicting their behaviour. Both are well developed in Poker-like situations, but less so in\ud more complex game and model domains. This paper addresses both tasks by using Bayesian inference in a benchmark space of reference agents. The concepts are explained and demonstrated using the game of chess but the model applies generically to any domain with quantifiable options and fallible choice. Demonstration applications address questions frequently asked by the chess community regarding the stability of the rating scale, the comparison of players of different eras and/or leagues, and controversial incidents possibly involving fraud. The last include alleged under-performance, fabrication of tournament results, and clandestine use of computer advice during competition. Beyond the model world of games, the aim is to improve fallible human performance in complex, high-value tasks

Publisher: Springer
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:centaur.reading.ac.uk:4517

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1978). The Rating of Chessplayers, Past and Present.
  2. (2003). Reference Fallible Endgame Play.
  3. (2005). Chess Endgame News.
  4. (2007). Gentlemen, Stop Your Engines!
  5. (2009). Skill Rating by Bayesian Inference. In:
  6. (2001). E.A.: Space-Efficient Indexing of Endgame Databases for Chess. In:
  7. (1992). KQKR: Awareness of a Fallible Opponent.
  8. (2003). Nosce Hostem: Searching with Opponent Models.
  9. Euclid’:28 Analysis of the Chess Ending King and Queen against King and Rook.
  10. (2002). Secrets of Pawnless Endings. 2nd revised edition,
  11. (1999). Parameter estimation in large dynamic paired comparison experiments. doi
  12. Chessbase News: D.P.Singh: Supreme Talent or Flawed Genius?
  13. Chessbase News: D.P.Singh has survived his ‘Agni Pariksha’
  14. Cheating Hearts Redux. The Daily Dirt Chess Blog
  15. TWIC: Tadeusz Gniota Memorial Tournament Report. This Week
  16. (2009). Player-engine choice-matching data. http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~regan/-chess/fidelity/FLM.html
  17. (1922). Theorie und Praxis der Endspiele,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.