Location of Repository

Production of tense marking in successive bilingual children: when do they converge with their monolingual peers?

By Theodoros Marinis and Vasiliki Chondrogianni

Abstract

Children with English as a second language (L2) with exposure of 18 months or less exhibit similar difficulties to children with Specific Language Impairment in tense marking, a marker of language impairment for English. This paper examines whether L2 children with longer exposure converge with their monolingual peers in the production of tense marking. \ud 38 Turkish-English L2 children with a mean age of 7;8 and 33 monolingual age-matched controls completed the screening test of the Test of Early Grammatical Impairment (TEGI). The L2 children as a group were as accurate as the controls in the production of -ed, but performed significantly lower than the controls in the production of third person –s. Age and YoE affected the children’s performance. The highest age-expected performance on the TEGI was attested in eight and nine year-old children who had 4-6 YoE. L1 and L2 children performed better in regular compared to irregular verbs, but L2 children overregularized more than L1 children and were less sensitive to the phonological properties of verbs. The results show that tense marking and the screening test of the TEGI may be promising for differential diagnosis in eight and nine year-old L2 children with at least four YoE

Topics: 153
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:centaur.reading.ac.uk:4386

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2007). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin-speaking children and adolescents: age-related differences.
  2. (1997). Bilingual children with Specific Language Impairment and standardised assessments: preliminary findings from a study of children in language units.
  3. (1997). Children's productivity in the English past tense: The role of frequency, phonology, and neighborhood structure. doi
  4. (2006). English inflection and derivation.
  5. (2006). Errors of omission in English-speaking children's production of plurals and past tense: the effects of frequency, phonology, and competition. doi
  6. (2005). Grammatical morphology in children learning English as a Second Language: Implications of similarities with Specific Language Impairment. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, doi
  7. (2000). Language sample analysis in Spanish-speaking children: methodological considerations.
  8. (2006). Performance of typically-developing school-age children with English as an additional language (EAL) on a test of receptive vocabulary Child Language Teaching and Therapy,
  9. (2003). Processing and linguistic markers in young children with specific language impairment.
  10. (2001). Rice/Wexler Test of Early Grammatical Impairment.
  11. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense.
  12. (1996). Similarities between SLI and L2 children: Evidence from the acquisition of Swedish word order.
  13. (2000). Tense and temporality: A comparison between children learning a second language and children with SLI.
  14. (2008). Tense as a clinical marker in English L2 acquisition with language delay/impairment. In E. Gavruseva & B. Haznedar (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: a generative perspective (pp. doi
  15. (2003). Test for Reception of Grammar,
  16. (2008). The acquisition of tense in English: distinguishing child second language from first language and specific language impairment. doi
  17. (2001). The acquisition of the IP system in child
  18. (1997). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale: Second Edition.
  19. (1996). The emergence of extended phrase structure in child L2 acquisition. In
  20. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children.
  21. (1994). Universal grammar in child second language acquisition: Null subjects and morphological uniformity.
  22. (2002). Why is "Is" easier that "-s"?-Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child L2-English learners.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.