Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Construction contract policy: do we mean what we say?

By Will Hughes and Yasuyoshi Maeda


Recent developments in contracting practice in the UK have built upon recommendations contained in highprofile reports, such as those by Latham and Egan. However, the New Engineering Contract (NEC), endorsed by Latham, is based upon principles of contract drafting that seem open to question. Any contract operates in the context of its legislative environment and current working practices. This report identifies eight contentious hypotheses in the literature on construction contracts and tests their validity in a sample survey that attracted 190 responses. The survey shows, among other things, that while partnership is a positive and useful idea, authoritative contract management is considered more effective and that “win-win” contracts, while desirable, are basically impractical. Further, precision and fairness in contracts are not easy to achieve simultaneously. While participants should know what is in their contracts, they should not routinely resort to legal action; and standard-form contracts should not seek to be universally applicable. Fundamental changes to drafting policy should be undertaken within the context of current legal contract doctrine and with a sensitivity to the way that contracts are used in contemporary practice. Attitudes to construction contracting may seem to be changing on the surface, but detailed analysis of what lies behind apparent agreement on new ways of working reveals that attitudes are changing much more slowly than they appear to be

Topics: 690, 340, 381
Publisher: RICS Foundation
Year: 2002
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1995). w w w . r i c s - f o u n d a t i o n . o r g RICS Foundation

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.