Location of Repository

Intake, growth and meat quality of steers given diets based on varying proportions of maize silage and grass silage

By Darren Thomas Juniper, Elizabeth Mary Browne, Alan Fisher, Michael John Bryant, Geoff Nute and David Beever


Simmental × Holstein-Friesian steers were offered four forage diets. These comprised grass silage (G); proportionately 0·67 grass silage, proportionately 0·33 maize silage (GGM); 0·33 grass silage, 0·67 maize silage ( MMG); maize silage ( M) from 424 (s.d. = 11·5) kg to slaughter at a minimum weight of 560 kg. Forages were mixed and offered ad libitum. Steers were offered 2 kg of a concentrate daily, the concentrate being formulated such that all steers had similar crude protein intakes across dietary treatments. A sample of steers was slaughtered at the beginning of the experimental period to allow the calculation of the rate of gain of the carcass and its components. Carcass dissection of a sample of steers allowed the development of a prediction equation of carcass composition based on thoracic limb dissection of all carcasses. Forage dry matter intake and live-weight gain increased linearly as maize silage replaced grass silage in the forage mixture, resulting in improvements in food conversion ratio (all P = 0·001). Killing-out proportion increased with maize silage inclusion ( P < 0·001) but fat and conformation scores did not differ significantly between diets. However, increasing maize inclusion in the diet resulted in a greater weight ( P = 0·05) and proportion ( P = 0·008) of fat in the carcass, and significant increases in internal fat deposition. The inclusion of maize led to a progressive increase in the daily gains of carcass ( P < 0·001), and significant increases in the daily gains of both fat ( P < 0·001) and lean tissue ( P < 0·001). Fat colour was more yellow in cattle given diets G and GGM than diets MMG and M ( P < 0·001) and colour intensity was lower on diet M than the other three diets ( P < 0·001). There were no significant differences in any aspects of eating quality between diets. Therefore, maize silage has the potential to reduce the time taken for finishing beef animals to achieve slaughter weight with no apparent detrimental effects on subsequent meat quality

Topics: 571
Publisher: British Society of Animal Science
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:centaur.reading.ac.uk:4454

Suggested articles



  1. (1985). A comparison of grass and corn silages for finishing steers.
  2. (1982). A comparison of the growth and carcass characteristics of steers reared on pasture and finished for varying periods on corn or grass silage.
  3. (1980). Anatomical jointing, tissue separation and weight recording: EEC standard method for beef.
  4. (1993). Assessors for sensory analysis. Part 1. Guide to the selection, training and monitoring of selected assessors.
  5. (1981). Council regulation (EEC) no.
  6. (1984). Determination of dry matter and gross energy of grass silage.
  7. (1982). Effect of feeding various levels of grass silage and corn silage to lactating dairy cows.
  8. (1998). Effect of forage maize harvested at different stages of maturity on feed intake and performance by growing beef cattle.
  9. (1994). Effect of marbling degree on beef palatability in Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle.
  10. (1978). Effect of stage of harvest and fineness of chopping on the voluntary intake and digestibility of maize silage by young beef cattle. doi
  11. (1999). Effect on milk production in dairy cows of feeding grass silage and maize silage as a mixture, or separately within days, or on alternate days, with low or high protein supplements.
  12. (1999). Effects of diet on carcass, meat and eating quality of once-bred Piemontese x Friesian heifers.
  13. (1980). Effects of supplementing maize and grass silages with barley, and maize silage with urea or ammonia, on the intake and performance of fattening bulls.
  14. (1995). Energy and protein requirements of ruminants.
  15. (1999). Factors affecting the feeding value of maize and grass silage in late lactation dairy cows.
  16. (1998). Factors affecting the intake of grass silage by cattle and prediction of silage intake.
  17. (2003). Farm management pocketbook (34th edition). Wye College,
  18. (1992). Forage mixtures for dairy cows: the effect on dry matter intake and milk production of incorporating different proportions of maize silage into diets based on grass silage of differing energy value.
  19. (1995). Forage mixtures for dairy cows: the effect on dry-matter intake and milk production of incorporating either fermented or urea-treated whole-crop wheat, brewers’ grains, fodder beet or maize silage into diets based on grass silage.
  20. (1982). Interrelationships between marbling, subcutaneous fat thickness and cooked beef palatability. doi
  21. (2000). Maize silage-based diets for finishing beef cattle.
  22. (1990). Maize: a farmer’s experience.
  23. (1974). Manual on EAAP methods for the assessment of carcass characteristics in cattle.
  24. (1998). Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat.
  25. (2000). Shelf life and eating quality of beef from cattle of different breeds given diets differing in n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid composition.
  26. (1999). Some effects of diet on beef meat and fat attributes.
  27. (1987). The cultivation of selected animal feed stuffs (maize and perennial ryegrass, whole plant silage and maize husks), and the economics of their use in fattening bulls.
  28. (1998). The effect on milk production of replacing grass silage with maize silage in the diet of dairy cows.
  29. (1979). The effects of cereal supplementation of grass and maize silages. doi
  30. (1998). The effects of the inclusion of either maize silage, fermented whole crop wheat or urea-treated whole crop wheat in a diet based on high-quality grass silage on the performance of dairy cows.
  31. (1970). The evaluation of a device for feeding group housed animals individually.
  32. (1993). The NIRS regression equations for silage evaluation. Press release,
  33. (1990). The potential for beef production from forage crops.
  34. (1990). The quality and utilisation of maize silage for dairy cattle.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.