Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Technical Change Theory and Learning Curves: Patterns of Progress in Energy Technologies

By Tooraj Jamasb


This paper presents a comparative analysis of energy technology learning and progress within the framework of Schumpeter’s invention-innovation-diffusion paradigm. We estimate learning by doing and research rates for a range of energy technologies in four stages of technical progress. Emerging and mature technologies respond slowly to research and development (R&D) and capacity expansion; evolving technologies exhibit high learning-by-doing and research rates; reviving technologies exhibit considerable response to learning-by-research although they do not face significant market constraints. We generally find higher learning-by-doing than learning-by-research rates but do not find any development stage where learning-by-doing alone is the dominant driver of technical change. Also, high capital intensity and market constraints appear to slow down the pace of progress of emerging and evolving technologies. We find little scope for potential substitution between learning-by-doing and learning-by-research across the technologies and different stages of their development path

Topics: Energy technology, electricity, technical change, learning curves
Publisher: Faculty of Economics
Year: 2006
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Apollo

Suggested articles


  1. (1934). 21Technical Change Theory & Learning Curves: Patterns of Progress in Energy Technologies, doi
  2. (2006). An economic perspective on experience curves and dynamic economies in renewable energy technologies, doi
  3. (1999). Analysis of wind turbine cost reductions: The role of research and development and cumulative production, paper presented at AWEA’s
  4. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Harper and Row, doi
  5. (1986). Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance, In Stiglitz, doi
  6. (1999). Dynamics of energy technologies and global change, doi
  7. (2004). Endogenizing R&D and market experience in the “bottom-up” doi
  8. (2000). Energy technology dynamics, doi
  9. Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy, International Energy Agency, doi
  10. (2004). Experiments with a methodology to model the role of R&D expenditures in energy technology learning processes: first results, doi
  11. (2002). Explaining learning curves for wind power, doi
  12. (1936). Factors affecting the cost of airplanes, doi
  13. (2002). Induced technical change in energy and environmental modeling: Analytic approaches and policy implications,
  14. (2003). Learning curve analysis for energy technologies: Theoretical and econometric issues, paper presented at the International Energy Workshop (IEW),
  15. (1990). Learning curves in manufacturing, doi
  16. (2001). Learning rates for energy technologies, doi
  17. (1952). Manufacturing progress functions,
  18. (2000). Modeling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations models with learning by doing and learning by searching, doi
  19. (1970). Perspectives on experience, Boston Consulting Group,
  20. (2004). Reducing costs of emerging renewable energy technologies: An analysis of the dynamic development with wind power as case study, doi
  21. (1963). Reliability of progress curves in airframe production, doi
  22. (2004). Støtte til Vedvarende Energi (in Danish), Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag,
  23. (1962). The economic implications of learning-by-doing, doi
  24. (2002). The Economics of the combined cycle gas turbine – An experience curve analysis, doi
  25. (1985). The experience curve: The economist’s perspective, doi
  26. (2002). The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany, and the United Kingdom, paper presented at the International Energy Workshop, doi
  27. (1987). The learning curve, diffusion, and competitive strategy, doi
  28. (1984). Treating progress function as a managerial opportunity, doi
  29. (2003). Wind power in Europe: A simultaneous innovationdiffusion model, paper presented at the

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.