Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Market Power and Technological Bias: The Case of Electricity Generation

By Paul Twomey and Karsten Neuhoff

Abstract

It is difficult to elminated all market power in electricity markets and it is therefore frequently suggested that some market power should be tolerated: extra revenues contribute to fixed cost recovery,facilitate investment and increase security of supply. This suggestion implicitly assumes all generation technologiesbenefit equally from market power. We assess a mixture of conventional and intermittent generation, eg coal plants and wind power. If all output is sold in the spot market, then intermittent generation benefits less frommarket power than conventional generation. Forward contracts or option contracts reduce the levelof market power but bias against intermittent generators persists

Topics: Classification-JEL: D42, D43, L12, L13, Q42, market power, technology choice, electricity markets, intermittent output, forward and option contracting
Publisher: Faculty of Economics
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/131603
Provided by: Apollo

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). A spot market model for pricing derivatives in electricity markets. doi
  2. (2004). Assessment of the global and regional geographical, technical and economic potential of onshore wind energy. doi
  3. (1998). Competition, contracts, and entry in the electricity spot market. doi
  4. (2004). Cournot competition, financial option markets and efficiency.
  5. (1993). Cournot competition, forward markets and efficiency. doi
  6. (2003). Does the black-scholes formula work for electricity markets? a nonparametric approach.
  7. (1984). Estimating effective concentration in deregulated wholesale electricity markets. doi
  8. (2002). Measuring market inefficiencies in california’s wholesale electricity industry. doi
  9. (1999). The electricity contract market in england and wales. doi
  10. (2002). The valuation of options on capacity. Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.