Location of Repository

Framingham risk score and alternatives for prediction of coronary heart disease in older adults

By N Rodondi, I Locatelli, D Aujesky, J Butler, E Vittinghoff, E Simonsick, S Satterfield, AB Newman, PWF Wilson, MJ Pletcher and DC Bauer

Abstract

Background: Guidelines for the prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) recommend use of Framingham-based risk scores that were developed in white middle-aged populations. It remains unclear whether and how CHD risk prediction might be improved among older adults. We aimed to compare the prognostic performance of the Framingham risk score (FRS), directly and after recalibration, with refit functions derived from the present cohort, as well as to assess the utility of adding other routinely available risk parameters to FRS. Methods: Among 2193 black and white older adults (mean age, 73.5 years) without pre-existing cardiovascular disease from the Health ABC cohort, we examined adjudicated CHD events, defined as incident myocardial infarction, CHD death, and hospitalization for angina or coronary revascularization. Results: During 8-year follow-up, 351 participants experienced CHD events. The FRS poorly discriminated between persons who experienced CHD events vs. not (C-index: 0.577 in women; 0.583 in men) and underestimated absolute risk prediction by 51% in women and 8% in men. Recalibration of the FRS improved absolute risk prediction, particulary for women. For both genders, refitting these functions substantially improved absolute risk prediction, with similar discrimination to the FRS. Results did not differ between whites and blacks. The addition of lifestyle variables, waist circumference and creatinine did not improve risk prediction beyond risk factors of the FRS. Conclusions: The FRS underestimates CHD risk in older adults, particularly in women, although traditional risk factors remain the best predictors of CHD. Re-estimated risk functions using these factors improve accurate estimation of absolute risk. © 2012 Rodondi et al

Year: 2012
DOI identifier: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034287
OAI identifier: oai:d-scholarship.pitt.edu:14163
Provided by: D-Scholarship@Pitt

Suggested articles

Preview


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.