Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Why the fuss over Brown’s <i>The Da Vinci code</i>? The dynamism of 'icons' and the in/stability of meaning

By C. Lombaard


Dan Brown’s book, “The Da Vinci code” (2003) and the sub-sequent motion picture by the same title (2006), have created a considerable stir within, but not limited to, Christian circles. The cause of the controversy is that, despite Brown’s overt pre-sentation of this work as fiction, it draws on figures, events and themes regarded in religious circles as sacred – most par-ticularly in Christian circles. Holy figures, events and themes are sensitive matters to believers: the meanings attached to them are regarded as essentially fixed, with connotations of perma-nence and eternity. Literature of many kinds, however, reinter-pret set meanings, loosening their perceived inflexibility, thus opening up a dynamism quite foreign to popular notions of definite meaning

Topics: Construction Of Meaning, Icons As Set Meanings, Reinterpretation Of Religion, The Da Vinci Code, Christianity, BR1-1725, Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, B, DOAJ:Religion, DOAJ:Philosophy and Religion, General Works, A, DOAJ:Multidisciplinary, DOAJ:General Works, Practical Theology, BV1-5099, Moral theology, BV4625-4780
Publisher: Scriber Editorial Systems
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.4102/koers.v74i1
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.