Location of Repository

Examining the Dynamics of Novation from the Principal Contractor's and Architect's Perspectives

By Alan Griffith, Andrew King and Andrew Knight

Abstract

Design and build is a popular form of procurement worldwide. In its conventional form, it is characterised by the integration between design and construction. Novation, a variant of design and build where design responsibility is transferred from designer to contractor as procurement evolves, has gained in popularity. However, the characteristics of the process, although well identified, continue to create confusion and problems for clients and contractors alike. This paper focuses on the dynamics of design and build novation from the principal contractor's and architect's perspectives. It embraces key aspects of both the pre-contract and post-contract environment. Its contribution forms a part of a major UK Government funded research project investigating design and build best practice. The findings presented in this paper broadly indicate that contractors believe novated design and build can be disadvantageous and that considerable fragmentation can be created in what should be an integrated procurement approach

Topics: Engineering economy, TA177.4-185, Building construction, TH1-9745
Publisher: UTS ePRESS
Year: 2012
DOI identifier: 10.5130/AJCEB.v3i1.2907
OAI identifier: oai:doaj.org/article:0e949653f920451f8ba47b87d0af8bbc
Journal:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://doaj.org/toc/2204-9029 (external link)
  • http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/j... (external link)
  • https://doaj.org/article/0e949... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.