Location of Repository

An experimental investigation of auctions and bargaining in procurement

By Jason Shachat and Lijia Tan


In reverse auctions, buyers often retain the right to bargain further concessions from the winner. The optimal form of such procurement is an English auction followed by an auctioneer's option to engage in ultimatum bargaining with the winner. We study behavior and performance in this procurement format using a laboratory experiment. Sellers closely follow the equilibrium strategy of exiting the auction at their costs and then accepting strictly profitable offers. Buyers generally exercise their option to bargain according to their equilibrium strategy, but their take-it-or-leave-it offers vary positively with auction prices when they should be invariant. We explain this deviation by modeling buyers' subjective posteriors regarding the winners' costs as distortions, calculated using a formulation of probability weighting, of the Bayesian posteriors. We show alternative models based upon risk aversion and anticipated regret can't explain these price dependencies.

Topics: D03 - Behavioral Economics; Underlying Principles, C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior, C34 - Truncated and Censored Models; Switching Regression Models, D44 - Auctions
Year: 2012
DOI identifier: 10.2139/ssrn.2170363
OAI identifier: oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:42409

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.