Article thumbnail

Spatial distribution of investment in Russia: the effect of agglomeration

By Valentina Lapo
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:GenericEPrints.OAI2:1993

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). A Guide to Modern Econometrics.
  2. (1998). Agglomeration and Endogenous Capital. doi
  3. (1995). Agglomeration Benefits and Location Choice: Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Investments in the United States / doi
  4. (1998). Agglomeration in the Global Economy: A Survey of the ‘New Economic Geography’. doi
  5. (1999). Agglomeration with human and Physical Capital: An Analytically Solvable case. Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), Discussion Paper 2102. 95 20. Fujita
  6. (2000). Competition, Geography, and Firm performance: doi
  7. (1954). Distributed lags and investment analysis. doi
  8. (2000). Does Foreign Ownership Matter? Russian Experience/ CEPR, doi
  9. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. doi
  10. (1997). Econometric analysis. doi
  11. (1996). Economic Integration, Intraindustry Trade and Frontier Regions. doi
  12. (1996). Equilibrium location with vertically linked industries. doi
  13. (1981). Estimation of Dynamic Models with Error Components, doi
  14. (2000). Evolving, Geographical Specialization of European Manufacturing Industries.
  15. (1995). Expansion of Markets and the Geographic Distribution of Economic Activities: The Trends doi
  16. (1997). Foreign Direct Investment as a Catalyst for Industrial Development. doi
  17. (1997). Geographic Concentration as a Dynamic Process. doi
  18. (1991). Geography and Trade. doi
  19. (1995). Globalization and the Inequality of Nations. doi
  20. (1998). Growing Location: Industry Location in a model of Endogenous Growth. doi
  21. (1991). History Versus Expectations. doi
  22. (1999). Home-Biased Demand and International Specialization: A Test of Trade Theories? CEP, London School of Economics, Working Paper.
  23. (2000). Increasing Return and All That: a View From Trade. doi
  24. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. doi
  25. (1991). Increasing returns, Industrialization and Indeterminacy of equilibrium. doi
  26. (1997). Increasing returns, trade and the regional Structure of wages. doi
  27. (2000). Industrial Performance, Agglomeration, and Foreign Manufacturing Investment in the UK. doi
  28. (1996). Integration, Specialization, and Adjustment. doi
  29. (1992). International Investment Location Decisions. doi
  30. (2000). Investment, Wages and Ownership during the Transition to a Market Economy: Evidence from Slovenian Firms.
  31. (1998). M. Economic Geography, Industry Location and Trade: The Evidence. doi
  32. Manski C.F.(1995) Identification problems in the Social Sciences. doi
  33. (1998). Market access, Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: en Empirical Assessment. doi
  34. (1996). Monopolistic Competition, Trade and Endogenous Spatial Fluctuations. doi
  35. (1998). Multiproduct Multinationals and reciprocal FDI Dumping. doi
  36. (1998). North American Economic Integration and Industry Location.. doi
  37. (2000). R&D and Technology Spillovers via FDI in the Czech Manufacturing Firms.
  38. Reform Strategies and Economic Performance of Russia’s Regions. doi
  39. (2000). Scale economies and the Geographic concentration of industry. doi
  40. (2000). Speed of Reform, Initial Conditions, Political Orientation or what? Explaining Russian Regions’ Economic Performance/ CEPR, doi
  41. (1999). The Core-periphery Model with Forward-Looking Expectations. doi
  42. (2000). The Determinants of foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies. Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), Discussion Paper 2638. 94 10. Blundell
  43. (1993). The Hub Effect; or Threeness in International Trade. doi
  44. (1991). The Practice of Econometrics Classic and Contemporary. doi
  45. (1998). The rise and fall of regional inequalities. doi
  46. (1997). The Role of Parts in the Making of Hub-effect.
  47. (2000). Дифференциация социально-экономического положения регионов России и проблемы региональной политики. Серия научных докладов РПЭИ,
  48. Субфедеральные налоговые льготы и их влияние на привлечение инвестиций. Эмпирический анализ. Серия научных докладов РПЭИ,
  49. (2000). Финансово промышленные группы России: влияет ли участие в ФПГ на инвестиции предприятий в основные средства. EERC, Финальный отчет по проекту.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.