Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Intrinsically disordered proteins and conformational noise Implications in cancer

By Gita Mahmoudabadi, Krithika Rajagopalan, Robert H Getzenberg, Sridhar Hannenhalli, Govindan Rangarajan and Prakash Kulkarni


Intrinsically disordered proteins, IDPs, are proteins that lack a rigid 3D structure under physiological conditions, at least in vitro. Despite the lack of structure, IDPs play important roles in biological processes and transition from disorder to order upon binding to their targets. With multiple conformational states and rapid conformational dynamics, they engage in myriad and often ``promiscuous'' interactions. These stochastic interactions between IDPs and their partners, defined here as conformational noise, is an inherent characteristic of IDP interactions. The collective effect of conformational noise is an ensemble of protein network configurations, from which the most suitable can be explored in response to perturbations, conferring protein networks with remarkable flexibility and resilience. Moreover, the ubiquitous presence of IDPs as transcriptional factors and, more generally, as hubs in protein networks, is indicative of their role in propagation of transcriptional (genetic) noise. As effectors of transcriptional and conformational noise, IDPs rewire protein networks and unmask latent interactions in response to perturbations. Thus, noise-driven activation of latent pathways could underlie state-switching events such as cellular transformation in cancer. To test this hypothesis, we created a model of a protein network with the topological characteristics of a cancer protein network and tested its response to a perturbation in presence of IDP hubs and conformational noise. Because numerous IDPs are found to be epigenetic modifiers and chromatin remodelers, we hypothesize that they could further channel noise into stable, heritable genotypic changes

Topics: Centre for Neuroscience, Mathematics
Year: 2013
DOI identifier: 10.4161/cc.23178
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. A ᅠ core ᅠ subunit ᅠ of ᅠ Polycomb ᅠ repressive ᅠ complex ᅠ 1 ᅠ is ᅠ broadly ᅠconserved ᅠin ᅠfunction ᅠbut ᅠnot ᅠprimary ᅠsequence. ᅠProc ᅠNatl ᅠAcad ᅠSci ᅠUSA ᅠ2012; ᅠ 109:1063-ᆳ‐71; ᅠPMID:
  2. Barrat ᅠA, ᅠBarthelemy ᅠM, ᅠVespignani ᅠA. ᅠIn ᅠ ᅠDynamical ᅠProcesses ᅠon ᅠComplex ᅠNetworks. ᅠ Cambridge ᅠUniversity ᅠPress ᅠ(2008). ᅠ ᅠ
  3. C, ᅠOldfield ᅠCJ, ᅠJi ᅠF, ᅠKlitgord ᅠN, ᅠCusick ᅠME, ᅠRadivojac ᅠP, ᅠet ᅠal. ᅠIntrinsic ᅠdisorder ᅠis ᅠa ᅠ common ᅠfeature ᅠof ᅠhub ᅠproteins ᅠfrom ᅠfour ᅠeukaryotic ᅠinteractomes. ᅠPLoS ᅠComput ᅠBiol ᅠ 2006; ᅠ2:e100; ᅠPMID: ᅠ16884331 ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ
  4. Cell ᅠ 2009; ᅠ 138:198-ᆳ‐2008; ᅠPMID: ᅠ19596244. ᅠ ᅠ 24. Marcotte ᅠEM, ᅠTsechansky ᅠM. ᅠDisorder, ᅠpromiscuity, ᅠand ᅠtoxic ᅠpartnerships. ᅠCell ᅠ2009; ᅠ 138: ᅠ16-ᆳ‐18; ᅠPMID: ᅠ19596229. ᅠ ᅠ
  5. Hub ᅠ promiscuity ᅠ in ᅠ protein-ᆳ‐protein ᅠ interaction ᅠ networks. ᅠInt ᅠJ ᅠMol ᅠSci ᅠ2010; ᅠ11:1930-ᆳ‐1943; ᅠPMID: ᅠ20480050. ᅠ ᅠ
  6. PF, ᅠBates ᅠPA. ᅠGlobal ᅠtopological ᅠfeatures ᅠof ᅠcancer ᅠproteins ᅠin ᅠthe ᅠhuman ᅠ interactome. ᅠBioinformatics ᅠ2006; ᅠ22: ᅠ2291-ᆳ‐2297; ᅠPMID: ᅠ16844706. ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ
  7. Xia ᅠJ, ᅠSun ᅠJ, ᅠJia ᅠP, ᅠZhao ᅠZ. ᅠDo ᅠcancer ᅠproteins ᅠreally ᅠinteract ᅠstrongly ᅠin ᅠthe ᅠhuman ᅠ protein-ᆳ‐protein ᅠ interaction ᅠ network? ᅠ Comput ᅠ Biol ᅠ Chem ᅠ 2011; ᅠ 35: ᅠ 121-ᆳ‐125; ᅠ PMID: ᅠ 21666777. ᅠ ᅠ

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.