Location of Repository

Visitor satisfaction analysis as a tool for park managers: a review and case study

By J. Tonge, S.A. Moore and R. Taplin


Visitor satisfaction has been an important area for leisure research since the 1960s and more recently for park management. A number of approaches have been adapted from consumer research including importance-performance analyses, gap analyses, threshold performance targets and overall satisfaction. This paper reviews these approaches with respect to park management. It then draws on focus group research with protected area agency staff to obtain their views on the usefulness and robustness of the analyses associated with these approaches. Yanchep National Park (Western Australia) was used as a case study, with the results from a recent visitor survey providing the data for satisfaction analyses. To provide a more accurate summary of the range in results, confidence intervals accompanied the results to illustrate the variation in responses. The analyses emphasize the importance for park managers of accessible, usable data on visitor satisfaction

Publisher: Australian & New Zealand Association for Leisure Studies
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au:14851
Provided by: Research Repository

Suggested articles



  1. (Department of Environment and Conservation)
  2. (2010). A revised importance-performance analysis of tour guide performance in China. Tourism Analysis,
  3. (2009). A transformation function corresponding to IPA and gap analysis.
  4. (2003). Alternate measurement approaches to recreational customer satisfaction: Satisfaction-only versus gap scores.
  5. (2002). An empirical investigation of the relationships between service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions among visitors to a wildlife refuge.
  6. (2001). Approaches to Measuring Quality of the Wilderness Experience.
  7. (2005). Collection, Storage and Application of Visitor Use Data in Protected Areas: Guiding Principles and Case Studies. The Gold Coast,
  8. (2007). Customer service quality, satisfaction and operational performance: A proposed model for Australian public aquatic centres.
  9. (2003). Developing a visitor satisfaction monitoring methodology: Quality gaps, crowding and some results.
  10. (1977). Importance-performance analysis.
  11. (2003). Manageable predictors of park visitor satisfaction: Maintenance and personnel.
  12. (2010). Modelling perceived quality, visitor satisfaction and behavioural intentions at the destination level.
  13. (2006). Monitoring visitor experiences in protected areas.
  14. (2008). Motivations and satisfactions of Taiwanese tourists who visit Australia.
  15. (2002). Natural Area Tourism: Ecology, Impacts and Management.
  16. (2010). Protected Area Management: Collection and Use of Visitor Data Volume 1: Summary and Recommendations Gold
  17. (2005). Protected Area Management: Principles and Practice.
  18. (2000). Quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions.
  19. (2001). Revisiting importance-performance analysis.
  20. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.
  21. (1986). Situational and subjective determinants of satisfaction in marine recreational fishing.
  22. (1986). Studies in Outdoor Recreation: A Review and Synthesis of the Social Science Literature in Outdoor Recreation.
  23. (2005). Study of Visitor Use and Satisfaction in Mungo National Park. The Gold Coast,
  24. (1995). The predictive validity of alternate approaches to evaluating quality of a festival.
  25. (2002). The use of a modified importance-performance framework to examine visitor satisfaction with attributes of outdoor recreation settings.
  26. (2003). The use of importance-performance analysis and market segmentation for tourism management in parks and protected Areas: An application to Tanzania's National Parks.
  27. (2010). Visitors' satisfaction, perceptions and gap analysis: The case of Dadia-Lefkimi-Souflion National Park. Forest Policy and
  28. (2010). Vital statistics.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.