Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Evaluating Communication in the British Parliamentary Public Sphere

By Aeron Davis

Abstract

This article begins with a re-evaluation of political communication research based on Habermas' original theory of the public sphere. It presents Habermas' alternative framework for assessing communication in contemporary ‘actually existing democracies’. The model is then tested with a case study of the UK parliamentary public sphere based on 95 semi-structured interviews with political actors (politicians, journalists and officials). It concludes that parliament today operates rather better, according to public sphere norms, than the public sphere described in Habermas' accounts of 18th and 19th-century England. Such a finding, on its own, is clearly at odds with public perception. The research accordingly offers two explanations for this disparity and the (perceived) crisis of political legitimacy in UK politics

Topics: L220, L380, P300
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.gold.ac.uk:6004

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1989). [1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a doi
  2. (2002). A conversation about questions of political theory’,
  3. (2005). A Habermasian analysis of the deliberative democratic potential of ICT-enabled services in Swedish municipalities’, doi
  4. (2000). A Virtuous Circle: Political Communication in Postindustrial Societies (Cambridge: doi
  5. (1996). Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: doi
  6. (2002). Between Radicalism and Resignation: Democratic Theory in Habermas’s Between Facts and Norms’,
  7. (2001). Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation (London:
  8. (2001). Changing Patterns of Governance in the United Kingdom (Houndsmill: doi
  9. (2007). Civil Service Employment Q2
  10. (2006). Conservative MP for Tunbridge Wells, adviser and Director of Conservative Policy Unit,
  11. (2004). Democracy and Participation: Popular Protest and New Social Movements doi
  12. (2002). Discourse and democracy: The formal and informal basis of legitimacy in between facts and norms’, doi
  13. (1992). Further reflections on the public sphere’, doi
  14. (2007). government cabinet minister 2001–02, government minister 2003–05, 8 doi
  15. (2007). Habermas and the public sphere’, doi
  16. (2000). Habermas, the public sphere, and democracy: A critical intervention’,
  17. (2004). House of Commons Liaison Committee: Annual Report for
  18. (2002). Introduction’,
  19. (2004). Is Britain Facing a Crisis of Democracy? (London:
  20. (2000). Journalism and Democracy: An Evaluation of the Public Sphere doi
  21. (2005). Jurgen Habermas: Democracy and the Public Sphere (London:
  22. (2006). Labour MP for Holborn and St Pancras, shadow minister and cabinet minister 1983–97, government cabinet minister 1997–99, 29
  23. (2006). Labour MP for Islington North,
  24. (2007). Labour MP for Liverpool Walton, opposition whip and spokesperson 1992–94, parliamentary secretary 1997–2000, 20
  25. (2005). Looking Back, Looking Forward. The Cook-Maclennan Agreement, Eight Years On (London: New Politics Network).
  26. (2002). Manufacturing Consent (2nd edn)
  27. (2002). Media and Power doi
  28. (2007). Media and Public Spheres (Basingstoke: doi
  29. (2005). MPs and Politics in Our Time (London:
  30. (1992). Nations, Publics and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century’,
  31. (2005). New mediation and direct representation: Reconceptualising representation in the digital age’, doi
  32. (2004). New Perspectives on the Public Sphere (Oxford: doi
  33. (2004). Packaging Politics: Political Communication in Britain’s Media Democracy (2nd edn) doi
  34. (2000). Political Scandal (Cambridge:
  35. (1988). Populist politics, communication media and large scale societal integration’, doi
  36. (2006). Power to the People: An Independent Enquiry into Britain’s Democracy (York: Joseph Rowntree Trust).
  37. (1997). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracies’, doi
  38. (2002). Revolts and Rebellions: Parliamentary Voting under doi
  39. (1995). Television and the Public Sphere: Citizenship, Democracy and the Media doi
  40. (2009). The Author. Journal compilation ©
  41. (2003). The core executive and the modernization of central government’,
  42. (2007). The House of Commons’, doi
  43. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere’, doi
  44. (2005). The Internet and political participation’, doi
  45. (2001). The Internet and the global public sphere’, doi
  46. (2006). The IPO Directory: Information and Press Officers in Government Departments and Public Corporations (London: Central Office of Information).
  47. (1995). The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media (Cambridge: doi
  48. (1995). The Power of News (Cambridge MA: doi
  49. (2005). The Rebels: How Blair Mislaid his Majority doi
  50. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action (Cambridge: doi
  51. (2003). Thurso, Liberal Democrat MP for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross, shadow minister
  52. (2001). Westminster Tales: The Twenty First Century Crisis in Political Journalism doi
  53. (2000). Whose parliament? Political oratory and print culture in the later eighteenth century’, doi
  54. (2007). Why We Hate Politics (Cambridge: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.